ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2386|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

LSAT-7-4-15

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-7-27 00:47:00 | 只看该作者

LSAT-7-4-15

15> The consistency of ice cream is adversely affected by even slight temperature changes in the freezer. To counteract this problem, manufacturers add stabilizers to ice cream. Unfortunately, stabilizers, though inexpensive, adversely affect flavor. Stabilizers are less needed if storage temperatures are very low. However, since energy costs are constantly going up, those costs constitute a strong incentive in favor of relatively high storage temperatures.



Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the passage?



(A) Even slight deviations from the proper consistency for ice cream sharply impair its flavor.


(B) Cost considerations favor sacrificing consistency over sacrificing flavor.


(C) It would not be cost effective to develop a new device to maintain the constancy of freezer temperatures.


(D) Stabilizers function well only at very low freezer temperatures.E


(E) Very low, stable freezer temperatures allow for the best possible consistency and flavor of ice cream.



原文思路: temperature changes => less of consistency


                        Add stabilizers => maintain consistency but degrade flavor


                        lower the temperature => less stabilizers needed =>stabler freezer => more of consistency


but can't conclude best possible flavor also maintains. So E shouldn't be right, what you think?


沙发
发表于 2004-7-27 13:12:00 | 只看该作者

LSAT-7-4-15

In E, "stable" modifies "freezer temperatures", not "freezer".

E is right:

consistently low temperatures --> best consistency of ice cream, and

consistently low temperatures --> least need for "Stabilizers" --> best flavor.

板凳
发表于 2019-8-1 17:57:32 | 只看该作者
valarie 发表于 2004-7-27 00:47
15> The consistency of ice cream is adversely affected by even slight temperature changes in the fre ...

Spot the question type - Infer ( Conditional Logic )

Temp changes ---> No Consistency

Stabilizer ---> affect flavor

If Low temp ---> No Stabilizer

Let us dive into the answers.

A. No, It impairs its consistency.

B. No, it stated clearly that the energy cost is a strong incentive for relatively high storage temps

C. Not necessary, since we do not discuss anything related to the cost of the new device.

D. No, it says S makes the consistency perfects but impairs the flavor. It never discussed why it would  malfunction if the temps are different.

E. Well... it looked really straight forward.


您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-23 13:19
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部