Excavations of the Roman city of Sepphoris have uncovered numerous detailed mosaics depicting several readily identifiable animal species: a hare, a partridge, and various Mediterranean fish. Oddly, most of the species represented did not live in the Sepphoris region when these mosaics were created. Since identical motifs appear in mosaics found in other Roman cities, however, the mosaics of Sepphoris were very likely created by traveling artisans from some other part of the Roman Empire.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends? - AThe Sepphoris mosaics are not composed exclusively of types of stones found naturally in the Sepphoris area.
- BThere is no single region to which all the species depicted in the Sepphoris mosaics are native.
- CNo motifs appear in the Sepphoris mosaics that do not also appear in the mosaics of some other Roman city.
- DAll of the animal figures in the Sepphoris mosaics are readily identifiable as representations of known species.
- EThere was not a common repertory of mosaic designs with which artisans who lived in various parts of the Roman Empire were familiar.
- 这道题的C,我想了半天都想不通,S没出现的也不在M出现,看大家都说,S出现的都在M出现,我感觉不太对啊。比如说我们有1,2,3,4,5,这些数字,S有1,2,3 M有1,2,完全符合S没出现的(4,5)也不在M 出现。 我觉得只能说明C选项,S和M有重复的数字,并不能推出S出现的必定在M出现。求各位大佬解惑!谢谢:)
|