ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then asked whether they can hear the hypnotist, they reply, "No." Some theorists try to explain this result by arguing that the selves of hypnotized subjects are dissociated into separate parts, and that the part that is deaf is dissociated from the part that replies.

Which of the following challenges indicates the most serious weakness in the attempted explanation described above?

正确答案: A

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 7988|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG12版,请教NN 63题,那个被催眠的聋子。。

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-7-26 18:17:57 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then asked whether they can hear the hypnotist,
they reply, “No.” Some theorists try to explain this result by arguing that the selves of hypnotized subjects are
dissociated into separate parts, and that the part that is deaf is dissociated from the part that replies.
Which of the following challenges indicates the most serious weakness in the attempted explanation
described above?
(A) Why does the part that replies not answer, “Yes”?
(B) Why are the observed facts in need of any special explanation?
(C) Why do the subjects appear to accept the hypnotist’s suggestion that they are deaf?
(D) Why do hypnotized subjects all respond the same way in the situation described?
(E) Why are the separate parts of the self the same for all subjects?


选 A,这题的解释我真的翻来覆去看了几篇都不明白啊
为啥题干中 分成了 deaf和reply的部分,而 OG 的解释说分成了 deaf和hearing的部分啊?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-7-26 23:16:54 | 只看该作者
题目问 weaken the explain.
explain 是怎样的呢,是认为被测试的人被催眠成了两半。一半是聋的,一半是回答问题的。
可是如果这个解释成立的话,那么回答问题的那一半显然是不聋的,并且听到了问题,否则他是不会回答的。那么为什么这个不聋的一半在回答问题的时候一定会选择说没有听见呢,也就是选择聋的那一半的反应呢。为什么他不会选择他不聋的这一半的反应呢,也就是YES,能听见呢?
也就是说这个解释不能够自圆其说。它的推论和它的条件是矛盾的。
板凳
发表于 2011-7-27 10:59:53 | 只看该作者
http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_CR/thread-570658-1-1.html
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2011-7-27 20:09:59 | 只看该作者
题目问 weaken the explain.
explain 是怎样的呢,是认为被测试的人被催眠成了两半。一半是聋的,一半是回答问题的。
可是如果这个解释成立的话,那么回答问题的那一半显然是不聋的,并且听到了问题,否则他是不会回答的。那么为什么这个不聋的一半在回答问题的时候一定会选择说没有听见呢,也就是选择聋的那一半的反应呢。为什么他不会选择他不聋的这一半的反应呢,也就是YES,能听见呢?
也就是说这个解释不能够自圆其说。它的推论和它的条件是矛盾的。
-- by 会员 yarndyed (2011/7/26 23:16:54)



谢谢啊~
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-7-27 20:10:38 | 只看该作者
http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_CR/thread-570658-1-1.html
-- by 会员 sanlingjie (2011/7/27 10:59:53)


你的解释真是新颖而且透彻啊,谢谢
6#
发表于 2011-10-11 22:55:12 | 只看该作者
你的解释很清楚,谢谢啊!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 04:10
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部