- UID
- 579779
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2010-11-3
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
When you negate A, you get "Drivers who equip their vehicles with radar detectors are more likely to be ticketed for exceeding the speed limit than are drivers who do not."
And this statement is consistent with one of the premise of the argument, therefore the argument still holds. IF you follow the logic chain of the author and adding the negated choice A), the argument is valid because that's what the author claims!
Whether or not the author's conclusion is right or wrong is not our concern for the assumption-type question. We have to treat the author's statements as correct. Since when you negate A, you do not weaken or refute the author's argument, the argument still holds. Therefore, A) is not the necessary assumption. |
|