CR一题求解答

houhaibo528 · 发表于 2011-8-27 16:30:37

The following proposal amend the bylaws of an organization was circulated to its members for comment.
When more than one nominee is to be named for an office, prospective nominees must consent to nomination and before giving such consent must be told who the other nominees will be.
Whic of the following comments concerning the logic of the proposal is accurate if it can't be known who the actual nominees are until prospective nominees have given their consent to be nominated?

A. The proposal would make it possible for each of several nominees for an office to be aware of who all of the other nominees are.
B. The proposal would widen the choice available to those choosing among the nominees.
C. If there are several prospective nominees, the proposal would deny the last nomineee equal treatment with the first.
D. The proposal would enable a prospective nominee to withdraw from competition with a specific person without making that withdrawl known.
E If there is more than one prospective nominee, the proposal would make it impossible for anyone to become a nominee.

整道题我读起来就是一团糊涂，希望朋友们大神们详细为我解答，另外我想问，题目中的nominees, prospective nominee有区别吗？？
提前感谢！

houhaibo528 · 发表于 2011-8-27 16:44:25

自顶，求解啊！

sanlingjie · 发表于 2011-8-27 18:42:23

E

text说准被提名人应该在给出同意提名前知道别的被提名人是谁，而题目又说一个准被提名人只能在知道别的被提名人是谁的情况下才能同意提名。这就矛盾了。所以proposal会使得任何人都无法成为被提名人。

sanlingjie · 发表于 2011-8-27 18:43:17

好，你的感谢我收入囊中了~~~~~~~~~~~

houhaibo528 · 发表于 2011-8-27 22:08:31

嘿嘿，非常感谢！

CR一题求解答

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()