ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Mice that have been given morphine are very likely to develop blood poisoning because bacteria that normally reside in the intestine typically respond to morphine by migrating into the bloodstream. However, when mice are given both morphine and the new drug naltrexone, blood poisoning is much less frequent, although it does still occur. These results provide support for researchers' prediction that naltrexone will turn out to be toxic to certain types of bacteria.
Which of the following, if discovered to be true, would most seriously weaken the support for the researchers' prediction?

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1086|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

逻辑 JJ 求讨论

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-7-22 16:14:28 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Mice that have been given morphine are very likely to develop blood poisoning because bacteria that normally reside in the intestine typically respond to morphine by migrating into the bloodstream.  However, when mice are given both morphine and the new drug naltrexone, blood poisoning is much less frequent, although it does still occur.  These results provide support for researchers' prediction that naltrexone will turn out to be toxic to certain types of bacteria.

Which of the following, if discovered to be true, would most seriously weaken the support for the researchers' prediction?

A: After being administered to mice, naltrexone does not pass from the bloodstream into the intestine.  
B: Naltrexone inhibits morphine from triggering the migration of intestinal bacteria into the bloodstream.  
C: Mice that have been given naltrexone but not morphine have no greater risk of developing blood poisoning than do mice that have not been given either substance.  
D: The increased risk of blood poisoning is not the only harmful effect on mice of being given morphine.  
E: Conditions other than the presence of intestinal bacteria in the bloodstream can cause blood poisoning in mice.
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-7-22 16:17:22 | 只看该作者
答案是?
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-7-22 16:23:08 | 只看该作者
B  E  徘徊中
地板
发表于 2011-7-22 17:36:12 | 只看该作者
结论是nal对b有toxic,前提是m导致b进入血液里面造成poison,对比m+nal的结果poison减少,整个argument是从一个比较得出的结论
A nal不会进入intestine 无关
B nal阻止b进入血液  他因削弱,nal对b的作用不是toxic。
C 比较有nal没M和没nal没M的情况  整篇都在讨论有M的情况,无关
D poison是M的唯一害处。    无关
E 他因导致poison      无关。结论是nal和b之间的关系,E能削弱的结论是M导致poison,不是本篇结论。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-23 05:00
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部