ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2086|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全1-16 查过历史帖

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-7-13 22:24:44 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
大全-1-16.In a political system with only two major parties, the entrance of a third-party candidate into an election race damages the chances of only one of the two major candidates. The third-party candidate always attracts some of the voters who might otherwise have voted for one of the two major candidates, but not voters who support the other candidate. Since a third-party candidacy affects the two major candidates unequally, for reasons neither of them has any control over, the practice is unfair and should not be allowed.

If the factual information in the passage above is true, which of the following can be most reliably inferred from it?

(A) If the political platform of the third party is a compromise position between that of the two major parties, the third party will draw its voters equally from the two major parties.

(B) If, before the emergence of a third party, voters were divided equally between the two major parties, neither of the major parties is likely to capture much more than one-half of the vote.

(C) A third-party candidate will not capture the votes of new voters who have never voted for candidates of either of the two major parties.

(D) The political stance of a third party will be more radical than that of either of the two major parties.B

(E) The founders of a third party are likely to be a coalition consisting of former leaders of the two major parties.
有个问题,感觉B 有个假设就是所有的人都参加了投票,而C正是反驳这个假设,所有B成立必先C成立,所以我选了C。但是,答案是B,求解,谢谢。
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-7-13 22:39:41 | 只看该作者
C有些绝对了。还是有可能capture the new voters的。只是不会有很多new voters。 所以B的说法可以推导出。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-7-14 10:33:20 | 只看该作者
如果有可能capture new voter那么则应说明new voter的数量比较少不足以于先前的党派比拟,这样B才成立吧。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-3 04:04
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部