|
请教NN:
刚开始准备逻辑, 做了一套大全里的TESTA, 耗时37:17分,准确率50%. 自己试图总结, 但发现好象有些题思路差得太远. 例如第5题:
5. Johnson is on firm ground when he asserts that the early editors of Dickinson’s poetry often distorted her intentions. Yet Johnson’s own, more faithful, text is still guilty of its own forms of distortion. To standardize Dickinson’s often indecipherable handwritten punctuation by the use of the dash is to render permanent a casual mode of poetic phrasing that Dickinson surely never expected to see in print. It implies that Dickinson chose the dash as her typical mark of punctuation when, in fact, she apparently never made any definitive choice at all.
Which of the following best summarizes the author’s main point?
(A) Although Johnson is right in criticizing Dickinson’s early editors for their distortion of her work, his own text is guilty of equally serious distortions.
(B) Johnson’s use of the dash in his text of Dickinson’s poetry misleads readers about the poet’s intentions.
(C) Because Dickinson never expected her poetry to be published, virtually any attempt at editing it must run counter to her intentions.
(D) Although Johnson’s attempt to produce a more faithful text of Dickinson’s poetry is well-meaning, his study of the material lacks sufficient thoroughness.（B）
(E) Dickinson’s editors, including Johnson, have failed to deal adequately with the problem of deciphering Dickinson’s handwritten manuscripts.
这题要仔细的推理的话, 除了B, 其他选项都有问题. 但题目问的是summarizes the author’s main point呀, 文中的先肯定: is on firm ground, 再否定:yet...is still guilty of, 在选项B中完全没有体现出来.
我的问题一: 是不是应该先从OG做起, 然后用逻辑大全和费费宝典来检验感觉? 因为毕竟OG有解释, 能够体现ETS的思路,利于形成自己的ETS观. 如果自己先总结, 再在OG里验证思路的话, 是不是走弯路了?
问题二: 有NN说CR可以省时间. 但题干要认真的读, 还要理出推理过程, 然后分析两个可能选项(假设能够用排除法去掉三个), 怎么也要2.5分钟吧? 怎么缩短时间呢?
谢谢!
[此贴子已经被作者于2004-5-21 13:47:29编辑过] | 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2004-5-20 05:22:00
楼主
要继续 加加油ing～～～～～