ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2239|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

之前讨论好少,也没看懂。。再问prep1-17-57题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-5-9 21:25:54 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Many people believe that(一些人的观点) because wages are lower in developing countries than in developed countries, competition from developing countries in goods traded internationally will soon eliminate large numbers of jobs in developed countries.Currently,(现状) developed countries' advanced technology results in higher productivity, which accounts for their higher wages.Advanced technology is being transferred ever more speedily across borders, but even with the latest technology, productivity and wages in developing countries will remain lower than in developed countries for many years because developed countries have better infrastructure and better-educated workers.When productivity in a developing country does catch up, experience suggests that wages there will rise.Some individual firms in developing countries have raised their productivity but kept their wages (which are influenced by average productivity in the country's economy) low.However, in a developing country's economy as a whole, productivity improvements in goods traded internationally are likely to cause an increase in wages.Furthermore, if wages are not allowed to rise, the value of the country's currency will appreciate, which (from the developed countries' point of view) is the equivalent of increased wages in the developing country.And although in the past a few countries have deliberately kept their currencies undervalued, that is now much harder to do in a world where capital moves more freely.
Question #57.549-06(23940-!-item-!-188;#058&000549-06)



The passage suggests that if the movement of capital in the world were restricted, which of the following would be likely?



(A) Advanced technology could move more quickly from developed countries to developing countries.

(B) Developed countries could compete more effectively for jobs with developing countries.

(C) A country's average wages could increase without significantly increasing the sophistication of its technology or the value of its currency.

(D) A country's productivity could increase without significantly increasing the value of its currency.

(E) Workers could obtain higher wages by increasing their productivity.
为什么D选项对啊,题目后面根本没有说到A country's productivity和国家货币的关系啊,只讲了货币和wage的关系,没有说到限制与否对产量和货币的关系啊?怎么推的,实在是没想通。。求解释~!还有E怎么错了呢,自己有点思路但不清晰说不清楚。




Question #57.549-06(23940-!-item-!-188;#058&000549-06)



The passage suggests that if the movement of capital in the world were restricted, which of the following would be likely?



(A) Advanced technology could move more quickly from developed countries to developing countries.

(B) Developed countries could compete more effectively for jobs with developing countries.

(C) A country's average wages could increase without significantly increasing the sophistication of its technology or the value of its currency.

(D) A country's productivity could increase without significantly increasing the value of its currency.

(E) Workers could obtain higher wages by increasing their productivity.
为什么D选项对啊,题目后面根本没有说到A country's productivity和国家货币的关系啊,只讲了货币和wage的关系,没有说到限制与否对产量和货币的关系啊?怎么推的,实在是没想通。。求解释~!还有E怎么错了呢,自己有点思路但不清晰说不清楚。
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-5-10 17:07:47 | 只看该作者
根据文章最后一句话即可做出来
板凳
发表于 2011-5-11 14:40:49 | 只看该作者
E意思应该没错,但是不这题的答案,首先这题的定位应该就是最后一句。定位做题最重要~
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2011-5-13 23:10:51 | 只看该作者
O(∩_∩)O谢谢,可是最后一句的意思是说在过去有一些国家可以故意让他们的货币贬值,而现在因为资本自由流动就很难了。哪里说了Productivity和currecy value的关系啊   ( 我又哪儿没想到啊,每次懂了后都坑爹的发现没想到的地方很简单。。)
5#
发表于 2011-5-16 08:57:44 | 只看该作者
这篇文章的意思是:一个国家的productivity增加了,那么工人的wage也应该增加,或者currency 增值。所以如果capital movement 没有 restricted, 一定是由productivity推出要么wage可以不增加,要么货币不增值。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-7-7 05:53
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部