4. The gray squirrel, introduced into local woodlands ten years ago, threatens the indigenous population of an endangered owl species, because the squirrels’ habitual stripping of tree bark destroys the trees in which the owls nest. Some local officials have advocated setting out poison for the gray squirrels. The officials argue that this measure, while eliminating the squirrels, would pose no threat to the owl population, since the poison would be placed in containers accessible only to squirrels and other rodents.
Which one of the following, if true, most calls into question the officials’ argument?
A. One of the species whose members are likely to eat the poison is the red squirrel, a species on which owls do not prey. B. The owls whose nesting sites are currently being destroyed by the gray squirrels feed primarily on rodents. C. No indigenous population of any other bind species apart from the endangered owls is threatened by the gray squirrels. D. The owls that tare threatened build their nests in the tops of trees, but the gray squirrels strip away back from the trunks. E. The officials’ plan entails adding the poison to food sources that are usually eaten by rodents but not by other animals.
参考答案:B 思路:本题的错误在于,作者提出一种解决问题的方法,但忽略了他的副作用或反作用,从而没有从根本上解决问题或引出其他更重要的问题。 A:无关 red squirrel B:如果rodents是owls的主要食物,那末毒死rodents将更严重的减少owls的数量。 C:无关 Here the concerned object is the owl, not the other birds D:无关 E:无关选项 Without further information about the rodents, this choice does not bother the argument
after reading the explaination, still feel a bit strange... why the answer can be B? if the poison is work for the squirrels and some rodents (refered to the last sentence of the question), choice B seems support... anybody help~~
[此贴子已经被作者于2007-11-1 12:16:44编辑过] |