ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3006|回复: 8
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教新版PREP2-89,谢谢!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-4-24 16:54:00 | 只看该作者

请教新版PREP2-89,谢谢!

89.   (29334-!-item-!-188;#058&003870)

 

Which of the following most logically completes the argument?

The growing popularity of computer-based activities was widely predicted to result in a corresponding decline in television viewing.  Recent studies have found that, in the United States, people who own computers watch, on average, significantly less television than people who do not own computers.  In itself, however, this finding does very little to show that computer use tends to reduce television viewing time, since __________.

A. many people who watch little or no television do not own a computer

B. even though most computer owners in the United States watch significantly less television than the national average, some computer owners watch far more television than the national average

C. computer owners in the United States predominantly belong to demographic groups that have long been known to spend less time watching television than the population as a whole does

D. many computer owners in the United States have enough leisure time that spending significant amounts of time on the computer still leaves ample time for watching television

E. many people use their computers primarily for tasks such as correspondence that can be done more rapidly on the computer, and doing so leaves more leisure time for watching television

答案居然是C。让人抓狂啊。。。是不是答案错了?

沙发
发表于 2009-4-24 18:38:00 | 只看该作者
题目说finding不能证明是computer use reduce time.可能因为computer owner本来看电视就少,不是因为有computer才变减少的。

我理解是这样的,希望能有其他XDJM提供意见。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2009-4-24 19:28:00 | 只看该作者

E为什么不行呢?

E为什么不行呢?
地板
发表于 2009-4-24 19:45:00 | 只看该作者
task这个……挺无关的(lawyer的资料里面对unle),我觉得。而且原文说了,他们平均看电视的时间要少于没有电脑的人,如果按E的话,有一定反驳文章的意思

而且一般像many,some这类的词,削弱的力量是很小的。


5#
发表于 2009-4-24 19:46:00 | 只看该作者
……打一半就给发表了……lawyer里的unrelated判断很能帮助做题
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-4-24 20:22:00 | 只看该作者

非常感谢!

非常感谢!
7#
发表于 2010-4-15 11:09:25 | 只看该作者
D为什么不对呢?电脑用户留下了不少业余时间看电视,所以不能说明电脑的使用就减少了看电视的时间啊
8#
发表于 2010-4-15 14:39:29 | 只看该作者
task这个……挺无关的(lawyer的资料里面对unle),我觉得。而且原文说了,他们平均看电视的时间要少于没有电脑的人,如果按E的话,有一定反驳文章的意思
而且一般像many,some这类的词,削弱的力量是很小的。


-- by 会员 babee2queen (2009/4/24 19:45:00)




非常赞同,many some,这种选项及其不准确,出现错误选项的可能很大
9#
发表于 2011-5-7 18:18:35 | 只看该作者
E为什么不行呢?
-- by 会员 LTT12345 (2009/4/24 19:28:00)


看了下,这道题都没理解到精髓,E选项的错误不在于many

原文的study 调查的对象是computer owner,得出的结论是computer use 和television watch时间的关系,owner 和computer use 之间是有GAP的。this finding does very little ....那么选项肯定是要和finding有关,也就是和owner有关。

E选项确实说明了computer use 不会减少 television watch 的时间,但是没有和study联系起来,不能complete the passage

B选项的关键再于虽然可以解释统计的结果--即看电视的时间少,但是不能正面说明reduce的问题,注意原文说的是reduce了时间
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-12-12 14:15
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部