ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1246|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教LSAT中的一题/LSAT-5-6-20

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-6-13 04:19:00 | 只看该作者

请教LSAT中的一题/LSAT-5-6-20

T5:


20.   olitician: Homelessness is a serious social problem, but further government spending to provide low-income housing is not the cure for homelessness. The most cursory glance at the real-estate section of any major newspaper is enough to show that there is no lack of housing units available to rent. So the frequent claim that people are homeless because of a lack of available housing is wrong.



That homelessness is a serious social problem figures in the argument in which one of the following ways?



(A) It suggests an alternative prospective to the one adopted in the argument.



(B) It sets out a problem the argument is designed to resolve.



(C) It is compatible either with accepting the conclusion or with denying it.



(D) It summarizes a position the argument as a whole is directed toward discrediting.(C)


(E) It is required in order to establish the conclusion.


我的问题:


1)看不懂所问的问题


2)为什么选C


3)这类问题什么做


谢谢,请大家帮忙!



沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2004-6-14 10:15:00 | 只看该作者
thank a lot!!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-5 18:17
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部