ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2684|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

【请教】亲哪,feifei26,为何不能选B,谢谢啦^,^

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-5-7 16:59:49 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
狒狒26. Barnes: The two newest employees at this company have salaries that are too high for the simple tasks normally assigned to new employees and duties that are too complex for inexperienced workers. Hence, the salaries and the complexity of the duties of these two newest employees should be reduced.
Which one of the following is an assumption on which Barnes’s argument depends?
(A) The duties of the two newest employees are not less complex than any others in the company.
(B) It is because of the complex duties assigned that the two newest employees are being paid more than is usually paid to newly hired employees.
(C) The two newest employees are not experienced at their occupations.
(D) Barnes was not hired at a higher-than-average starting salary.
(E) The salaries of the two newest are no higher than the salaries that other companies pay for workers with a similar level of experience.

请问B错在哪儿?个人感觉是和unusally paid无关,因此是无关选项。但是狒狒详解说是“B: 这似乎在为两个新雇员拿高工资找理由,所以不能支持结论。",这个解释看不懂啊~
请牛人帮忙解释~~谢谢啦
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-5-8 01:37:17 | 只看该作者
Necessary assumption. Use negation.

If you negate B, you have:
It is NOT because of the complex duties assigned that the two newest employees are being paid more than is usually paid to newly hired employees. If this is the case, we might still reduce the starting salaries for the newcomers.  So the conclusion still hold.  Thus, B is not a necessary condition for the argument.

If you negate C, you will make the argument fall apart.
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-5-8 10:51:14 | 只看该作者
Necessary assumption. Use negation.

If you negate B, you have:
It is NOT because of the complex duties assigned that the two newest employees are being paid more than is usually paid to newly hired employees. If this is the case, we might still reduce the starting salaries for the newcomers.  So the conclusion still hold.  Thus, B is not a necessary condition for the argument.

If you negate C, you will make the argument fall apart.
-- by 会员 sdcar2010 (2011/5/8 1:37:17)



谢谢亲~讲得很到位!看来我逻辑的取反思维还有待加强,平时很少这样解题
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-13 01:25
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部