OG 语文分册 CR 79

xunmengELF · 发表于 2011-4-25 11:21:11

Consumer health advocate: Your candy company adds caffeine to your chocolate candy bars so that each one delivers a specified amount of caffeine. Since caffeine is highly addictive, this indicates that you intend to keep your customers addicted.
Candy manufacturer: Our manufacturing process results in there being less caffeine in each chocolate candy bar than in the unprocessed cacao beans from which the chocolate is made.
The candy manufacturer's response is flawed as a refutation of the consumer health advocate's argument because it
(A) fails to address the issue of whether the level of caffeine in the candy bars （sold by the manufacturer） is enough to keep people addicted
(B) assumes without warrant that all unprocessed cacao beans contain a uniform amount of caffeine
(C) does not specify exactly how caffeine is lost in the manufacturing process
(D) treats the consumer health advocate's argument As though it were about each candy bar rather than about the manufacturer's candy in general
(E) merely contradicts the consumer health advocate's conclusion without giving any reason to believe that the advocate's reasoning is unsound
答案说是A，但我觉得D说的是单只bar不会让人addictive，但是总量大了就会了，这不是很好的削弱吗？难道我理解错了？

xunmengELF · 发表于 2011-4-25 13:23:09

牛牛们给个指点吧~~~

cdwayne · 发表于 2011-4-25 18:26:04

這是flaw題
CHA說會造成上癮
CM說比起別的我還算少的呢

CM並未對CHA的話造成反駁，誰說另一個就不會讓人上癮？-->(A)

(D) CM誤以為CHA針對所有的candy bar而並非針對CM的candy bar-->並沒有，CHA已說YOUR candy company。

xunmengELF · 发表于 2011-4-25 18:51:49

原来是这样。。。是我理解错了。。。。谢谢你哈！~~~

OG 语文分册 CR 79

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()