Excavations of the Roman city of Sepphoris have uncovered numerous detailed mosaics depicting several readily identifiable animal species: a hare, a partridge, and various Mediterranean fish. Oddly, most of the species represented did not live in the Sepphoris region when these mosaics were created. Since identical motifs appear in mosaics found in other Roman cities, however, the mosaics of Sepphoris were very likely created by traveling artisans from some other part of the Roman Empire. Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends? - The Sepphoris mosaics are not composed
exclusively of types of stones found naturally in the Sepphoris area. - There is no single region to which all
the species depicted in the Sepphoris mosaics are native. - No motifs appear in the Sepphoris
mosaics that do not also appear in the mosaics of some other Roman city. - All of the animal figures in the
Sepphoris mosaics are readily identifiable as representations of known species. - There was not a common repertory of
mosaic designs with which artisans who lived in various parts of the Roman Empire were familiar.
请大家帮我讲讲这个题,题目读懂了,可是每个选项都读不明白。也看不出来选项和题目的联系。
正确答案是E。我第一次选了A, 第二次选了B.
[此贴子已经被作者于2009-6-25 3:29:47编辑过] |