ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1478|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]请教OG-61题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-6-4 17:05:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]请教OG-61题

The recent dicline in the value of the dollar was triggered by a prediction of slower economic growth in the coming year . But that prediction would not have adversely affected the dollar had it not been for the government 's huge budget deficit , which must therefore be decreased to prevent future currency declines .


Which of the following ,if ture ,would most seriously weaken the conclusion about how to prevent future currency declines?


A: The government has made little attempt to reduce the budget dificit .


B:The budget dificit has not caused a slowdown in economic growth .


C:The value of the dollar diclined several times in the year prior to the recent prediction of slower economic growth .


D:Before there was a large budget deficit,predictions of slower economic growth frequently caused diclines in the dollar's value.


E:When there is a large budget dificit, other events in addition to predictions of slower economic growth sometimes trigger declines in currency value.


答案是D


请指教



沙发
发表于 2004-6-4 23:59:00 | 只看该作者

原文的逻辑,是B导致了C, 所以不是A导致了C. 用了他因削弱。

答案的逻辑,在B存在以前,都是A导致了C. 也就是非B也会有C,排除了他因。所以削弱。

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-6-5 12:06:00 | 只看该作者
哦,原来是酱紫拉
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-26 22:19
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部