ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Firms adopting "profit-related-pay" (PRP) contracts pay wages at levels that vary with the firm's profits. In the metalworking industry last year, firms with PRP contracts in place showed productivity per worker on average 13 percent higher than that of their competitors who used more traditional contracts.

If, on the basis of the evidence above, it is argued that PRP contracts increase worker productivity, which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken that argument?

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3703|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助 og12-cr-116

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-9-27 21:19:27 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Firms adopting "profit-related-pay" (PRP) contracts pay wages at levels that vary with the firm's profits. In the metalworking industry last year, firms with PRP contracts in place showed productivity per worker on average 13 percent higher than that of their competitors who used more traditional contracts.

If, on the basis of the evidence above, it is argued that PRP contracts increase worker productivity, which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken that argument?

(A)    Results similar to those cited for the metalworking industry have been found in other industries where PRP contracts are used.
(B)    Under PRP contracts costs other than labor costs, such as plant, machinery, and energy, make up an increased proportion of the total cost of each unit of output.
(C)  Because introducing PRP contracts greatly changes individual workers' relationships to the firm, negotiating the introduction of PRP contracts is complex and time-consuming.
(D)    Many firms in the metalworking industry have modernized production equipment in the last five years, and most of these introduced PRP contracts at the same time.
(E)    In firms in the metalworking industry where PRP contracts are in place, the average take-home pay is 15 percent higher than it is in those firms where workers have more traditional contracts.

请问大家  b 怎么不对呢  我觉得 使用这种方法 使得cost增加也能驳斥原文啊   谢谢大家了~
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-9-27 21:30:21 | 只看该作者
proportion。。。
板凳
发表于 2010-9-27 21:38:06 | 只看该作者
特地去看了一下OG,B是无关的.cost增加减少都和这个推理没关系.
有一部分题目说得情况那是五花八门天上地下的,但本质是一样的.比如这个,应该是先后发生两件事情之间的因果关系.原文认为效率提高是PRP的功劳,那驳斥的方法就是存在一个其他的事件,使得另一种可能性存在,即效率高上去是现代化造成的,和合同制度没有关系...
地板
发表于 2011-6-16 15:57:27 | 只看该作者
楼上正解啊。。。thx
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-10 01:32
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部