ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3754|回复: 12
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD 18 37 完全看补丁的逻辑 NN们 帮忙

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-3-27 20:27:35 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
GWD 18 37 完全看不懂啊 NN们帮忙看一下呀
Q37: GWD-29-Q17
The total market value of real estate in Altonville has steadily declined over the past four years.This decline has meant that the overall figure on which the city’s property tax is based—the assessed value of that real estate—has also declined.The percentage of assessed value that was paid as property taxes to the city, however, did not change from year to year during this period.



The information above most strongly supports which of the following?



  1. The percentage of Altonville’s yearly revenue that comes from money collected in property taxes did not change over the past four years.


  2. The percentage of Altonville’s yearly revenue that comes from money collected in property taxes has declined steadily over the past four years.


  3. The amount of revenue that Altonville collected from property taxes was lower last year than it was four years ago.(答案)


  4. During the past four years, Altonville officials increased tax rates on other sources of revenue such as retail sales and business profits.


  5. Altonville will soon require property owners to pay a higher percentage of the assessed value of their property as property tax.

    NN们 帮忙解释一下 题干 基本比较 奇怪 C为什么就可以归纳出来呢


收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-3-27 20:42:21 | 只看该作者
地产价格连续四年下降; assessed value 降了as well; 房产税率在此期间不变。 可推导出:去年房产税的总收入比四年前低

房产税 = assessed value * 房产税率
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-3-27 20:49:25 | 只看该作者
明白了  我对那个  逻辑文章的 一些 概念 不太懂 限时做题 就puzzled  你说 这个问题咋解决呀 ?但是你那样用分号隔开 内容 我觉得思路超级清晰
地板
发表于 2011-3-27 21:04:03 | 只看该作者
No trick. Practice. Practice. Practice. Get the premise. Get the conclusion. Get the logic chain. Then to the victory - charge!!!
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-3-27 21:07:56 | 只看该作者
对了 那我再问一下 你说 对于错的题 我应该怎么 来总结 什么之类的吗 我做GWD 24  每个 大概都要错 4,5了逻辑 反正 想好好总结一下 错误 你觉得怎么总结效果好呀
6#
发表于 2011-3-27 21:10:42 | 只看该作者
In my case, I would analyze why I made the mistake; why I did not see the trap; which part of my problem-solving strategy failed me. Then make sure you won't fall for the same or similar mistake again.
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-3-27 21:24:06 | 只看该作者
呵呵 你的problem-solving strategy   是什么呀  如果 愿意 你给我详细讲一下 我逻辑 有点 问题。不是想偏  就是 不知道它在讲什么
8#
发表于 2011-3-27 21:49:11 | 只看该作者
your strategy to solve a CR problem, like what I mentioned in #3.
9#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-3-27 22:33:15 | 只看该作者
I see  以后还要 多多 请教你的 你也留意一下我的问题  哎 着急呀 谢谢
10#
发表于 2011-3-27 22:35:34 | 只看该作者
1) Recognize the key words such as Therefore, Thus, Since, Because, Conclusively, Clearly, etc., which indicate either a premise or a conclusion.
2) Know which is the premise and which is the conclusion.
3) Recognize the logic chain involved from premise to conclusion.
4) Notice the gap between premise and conclusion, if there is any.
5) Become crystal clear about the sope of the argument. Most wrong choices are out of the scope.
6) Be familiar with common logical fallacies.
7) Then label 5 answer choices as contenders and losers. If only one contender left, that is the correct answer. If there are more than one contender left, focus ONLY on these contenders and figure out why one is the best, thus, the correct answer.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-7 00:19
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部