ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2461|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

狒狒85

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-12-2 18:12:00 | 只看该作者

狒狒85

In opposing the 1970 Clean Air Act, the United States automobile industry argued that meeting the act’s standards for automobile emissions was neither economically feasible nor environmentally necessary. However, the catalytic converter, invented in 1967, enabled automakers to meet the 1970 standards efficiently. Currently, automakers are lobbying against the government’s attempt to pass legislation that would tighten restrictions on automobile emissions. The automakers contend that these new restrictions would be overly expensive and unnecessary to efforts to curb air pollution. Clearly, the automobile industry’s position should not be heeded.
85. Which one of the following most accurately expresses the method used to counter the automakers’ current position?  

(A) The automakers’ premises are shown to lead to a contradiction.
(B) Facts are mentioned that show that the automakers are relying on false information.
(C) A flaw is pointed out in the reasoning used by the automakers to reach their conclusion.
(D) A comparison is drawn between the automakers’ current position and a position they held in the past.
(E) Evidence is provided that the new emissions legislation is both economically feasible and environmentally necessary.
非常明显,the catalytic converter的作用表明automakers’的观点是站不住脚的。
我觉得应该是B,但是答案却是D



[此贴子已经被作者于2003-12-2 18:12:48编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2003-12-2 20:14:00 | 只看该作者
文章是说以前的例子表明现在的说法不正确,可没说现在的说法来自不真实的信息啊
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2003-12-2 21:11:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用cranberry在2003-12-2 20:14:00的发言:
文章是说以前的例子表明现在的说法不正确,可没说现在的说法来自不真实的信息啊

的确如此,当时没有完全理解题意
地板
发表于 2011-3-11 11:51:37 | 只看该作者
可以解释一下这道题的意思吗?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-26 13:14
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部