ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1929|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求一道语法题目

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-3-9 13:25:56 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Not all employment selection mechanisms that have a “disparate effect,” that is, that screens out a percentage of minorities or women disproportionate to their presence in the relevant labor market, are unlawful.
(A) that is, that screens out a percentage of minorities or women disproportionate to
(B) which means, that screens out a percentage of minorities or women disproportionate with
(C) which means, that screen out a percentage of minorities or women disproportionate with
(D) that is, that screen out a percentage of minorities or women disproportionate to
(E) that is, that screens out a percentage of minorities or women disproportionate with

为什么是D 啊
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-3-9 14:27:28 | 只看该作者
"disaproportionate to "means 不成比例的,exclude the answer of BCE,then, the differences betweem A and D lies in the "screen' or "screens", but in my point of view, the anwer'A" is correct,because the modifer is "effect' not the mechanishms...................now , i am confused  virtually, call for help
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-3-9 20:53:47 | 只看该作者
confused
地板
发表于 2011-3-9 22:30:37 | 只看该作者
关键是区分that is之后的从句是修饰effect还是mechanisms.倾向于选择mechanisms,原因有三:第一,that is是插入语,“即...”,如果从句修饰effect,不需要加that is多此一举,定语从句本身就是对先行词的解释说明嘛;第二,插入语相对独立可以去掉,两个定语从句连在一起显得很冗长;第三,从意思上看,that is前后两个从句是并列关系,说的是一回事,但前者(have a disparate effect)比较抽象,怕读者不理解,又在后面加了一个从句具体解释这些机制运行的结果.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-23 15:24
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部