ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3026|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助 关于这个问题的问法倒是是什么意思

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-2-24 13:42:16 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式

58. Some peoplesay that the scarcity of food is a function of the finite limits of the earth’sresources, coupled with a relentless rate of population growth. This analysisfails to recognize, however, that much of the world’s agricultural resourcesare used to feed livestock instead of people. In the United States, for example, almostone-half of the agricultural acreage is devoted to crops fed to livestock. Asteer reduces twenty-one pounds of inexpensive grain to one pound of expensivemeat. Thus, the scarcity of food is not merely a function of limited resourcesand population growth.

Which one of thefollowing is an assumption that would allow the conclusion in the argument tobe properly drawn?

请问这里这个问法到底是什么意思啊?an assumption that would allow the conclusion in the argument to be properly drawn?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-2-24 20:36:53 | 只看该作者
It asks you to find a sufficient assumption, or justification, for the argument to be drawn.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-30 06:45
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部