ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2129|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

这道题让人迷茫

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-2-21 06:36:34 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
大家好 麻烦大家看一下这道题 有点费解:
Local phone companies have monopolies on phone service within their areas. Cable television can be transmitted via the wires that are already in place and owned by the phone companies. Cable television companies argue that if the telephone companies were to offer cable service, these telephone companies would have an unfair advantage, because their cable transmissions could be subsidized by the profits of their monopolies on phone service.
15. Which of the following, if true, would ease the cable companies’ fear of unfair competition?
(A) In order to use existing telephone wire, telephone companies would need to modernize their operations, a process so expensive it would virtually wipe out all profit from their monopoly for the foreseeable future.
(B) If a phone company were to offer cable service within a particular area, it would have a monopoly within that area.
(C) The cost of television service, whether provided by cable or telephone companies, scales; that is, the total cost of transmission rises only marginally as more homes are added to the network.
(D) Cable programming that offers more channels is already available through satellite dish, but the initial cost of the dish is extremely high.
(E) Cable television will never be able to compete with the burgeoning video rental industry, especially as more homes now have video cassette recorders than ever did before.
答案是A 我想问下为什么?
谢谢大家!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-2-21 10:41:29 | 只看该作者
The assumption of the argument is that if the telephone company offers cable service via the existing wires, it is cheaper to do so, thus, unfair for the cable company.

A refutes such an assumption.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-7 02:00
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部