请教21I-19

albert · 发表于 2003-5-29 22:37:00

19. In Australia the population that is of driving age has grown large over the last five years, but the annual number of traffic fatalities has declined. This leads to the conclusion that, overall, the driving-age population of Australia consists of more skillful drivers now than five years ago.
Each of the statements below, if true, weakens the argument EXCEPT:
(A) Three years ago, a mandatory seat-belt law went into effect throughout Australia.
(B) Five years ago. Australia began a major road repair project
(C) Because of increases in the price of fuel Australians on average drive less each year than in the preceding year.
(D) The number of hospital emergency facilities in Australia has doubled in the last five years
(E) In response to an increase in traffic fatalities. Australia instituted a program of mandatory driver education five years ago.
Answer: E why not B?
B也算WEAKEN吗？修好了路难道一定导致交通死亡率下降吗？我觉得B提供的信息需要加入一些additional information才能WEAKEN原文。

[此贴子已经被作者于2003-5-30 2:13:40编辑过]

siebel · 发表于 2003-5-30 01:39:00

14 C是说酒后开车危险，两个人都同意吧（至少没有人不同意吧）。
15 心有77淹。

albert · 发表于 2003-5-30 02:12:00

14哦。不好意思。这道题前几天已经解决了。
大家集中精力看19题。谢谢！

albert · 发表于 2003-5-30 10:44:00

albert · 发表于 2003-5-31 11:10:00

mzyzhu · 发表于 2003-6-9 17:45:00

我再找我自己提的3个问题的老贴子时，发现了这个问题，

在英语国家中, the acquisitiveness of skill总是accompany with education. 只有talent 是不需要学习的。这可能使他们认同的最基本的assumption. 所以结论中的skill至少不会被e中的mandatory education program weaken.

道路修好了，确实能降低死亡率，这些国家在downtown之外的车速一般都可以达到100km/h以上。

我问的三道题，t14/s4/q15, t15/s2/q21, t5/s2/q21一直没人回答，可能是有人问过了，但是没有收集到总结版里，我现在正在一页一页向前翻，若你有兴趣，请发表你的看法。

albert · 发表于 2003-6-9 20:40:00

mzyzhu, thank you for your help!
because I haven't done LSAT1-6 13-15 yet, so unfortunately I can't reply your post right now....maybe someone else can help you

请教21I-19

请教21I-19

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()