ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Until now, only injectable vaccines against influenza have been available. They have been used primarily by older adults, who are at risk for complications from influenza. A new vaccine administered in a nasal spray has proven effective in preventing influenza in children. Since children are significantly more likely than adults to contract and spread influenza, making the new vaccine widely available for children will greatly reduce the spread of influenza across the population.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2643|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

新prep1-107(已搜索过没有讨论哦~)

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-9-5 16:15:42 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
107.    (26093-!-item-!-188;#058&001880)    (GWD 1-Q40 different type)

Until now, only injectable vaccines against influenza have been available.  They have been used primarily by older adults, who are at risk for complications from influenza.  A new vaccine administered in a nasal spray has proven effective in preventing influenza in children.  Since children are significantly more likely than adults to contract and spread influenza, making the new vaccine widely available for children will greatly reduce the spread of influenza across the population.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
A. If a person receives both the injectable and the nasal-spray vaccine, the two vaccines do not interfere with each other.
B. The new vaccine uses the same mechanism to ward off influenza as injectable vaccines do.
C. Government subsidies have kept the injectable vaccine affordable for all older adults.
D. Of the older adults who contract influenza, relatively few contract it from children with influenza.
E. Many parents would be more inclined to have their children vaccinated against influenza if the vaccination did not require an injection.
答案是E,B为什么不对呢??,
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-9-5 16:45:02 | 只看该作者
B:
虽然children比adults更有可能感染和传播流感,但以前家长们却没让children去注射疫苗。既然是一样的mechanism, 现在家长仍有可能不会去让children去使用nasal spray.
E:
很好地填补了以上gap.
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-9-5 17:00:50 | 只看该作者
B:
虽然children比adults更有可能感染和传播流感,但以前家长们却没让children去注射疫苗。既然是一样的mechanism, 现在家长仍有可能不会去让children去使用nasal spray.
E:
很好地填补了以上gap.
-- by 会员 elaineyll (2010/9/5 16:45:02)


明白啦!谢谢!~~~~~~~~~~
地板
发表于 2013-4-29 14:37:26 | 只看该作者
可是为什么不选A啊,我觉得如果把A取反就会削弱文章的结论了啊······
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-17 06:19
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部