GWD1-Q18:
It is illegal to advertise prescription medications in Hedland except in professional medicaljournals or by mail directly to physicians.A proposed law would allow general advertising of prescription medications. Opponents object that, in general, laypersons lack the specialized knowledge to evaluate such advertisements and might ask their physicians for inappropriate medications. But since physicians have the final say as to whether to prescribe a medication for a patient, the objection provides no grounds for concern.Which of thefollowing would it be most useful to establish in order to evaluate the argument?
- Whether nonprescription medications can interact with and block the action of any prescription medications
that could be advertised to the general public - Whether most prescription medication advertisements directed at the general public would be advertisements for
recently developed medications newly available by prescription - Whether prescription medication advertisements directed at the general public would appear on television
and radio as well as in print - Whether physicians are more likely to pay attention to advertising directed to the general public than to
advertising directed to physicians - Whether physicians are likely to succumb to pressure from patients to prescribe inappropriate medications
答案选E，我的理解“此种题目,只要Support\Weaken任何一方的言论,都是对evaluate argument有用!因为题目本身未对两方言论孰是孰非做定论!!”我想说的是，因为反对者为了支持其结论，说了一个理由；而反对反对者的为了说明反对者无效，又说了一个理由。这两部分统称为argument吧？因此，如果有答案是“客户是否因为知道自己无知，而不表达自己对药物的要求”，也应该是一个正确答案。请看看我说的对不对吧。
另请教，argument包括conclusion部分么？还是只包括reason哪部分啊？？？谢谢！
牛津字典的解释： a set of reasons that show that something is true or untrue, right or wrong etc
[此贴子已经被作者于2008-10-28 4:30:38编辑过] | 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2008-10-28 04:19:00
