ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4277|回复: 9
打印 上一主题 下一主题

逻辑新题,很困惑,据说是高分题,大家看看吧

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-12-25 12:51:16 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
为了 不影响大家的思路,我先不说正确答案,大家尽可能写出解题思路吧

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-12-25 13:30:15 | 只看该作者
Amphibian populations are declining in numbers worldwide. Not coincidentally, the earth’s ozone layer has been continuously depleted throughout the last 50 years. Atmospheric ozone blocks UV-B, a type of ultraviolet radiation that is continuously produced by the sun, and which can damage genes. Because amphibians lack hair, hide, or feathers to shield them, they are particularly vulnerable to UV-B radiation. In addition, their gelatinous eggs lack the protection of leathery or hard shells. Thus, the primary cause of the declining amphibian population is the depletion of the ozone layer.

Each of the following, if true, would strengthen the argument EXCEPT:

(A) Of the various types of radiation blocked by atmospheric ozone, UV-B is the only type that can damage genes.
(B) Amphibian populations are declining far more rapidly than are the populations of nonamphibian species whose tissues and eggs have more natural protection from UV-B.
(C) Atmospheric ozone has been significantly depleted above all the areas of the world in which amphibian populations are declining.
(D) The natural habitat of amphibians has not become smaller over the past century.
(E) Amphibian populations have declined continuously for the last 50 years.

This is an old LSAT LR question.  The answer is A, which does not support the conclusion that ozone depletion is the major threat to these frogs
板凳
发表于 2010-12-25 13:33:44 | 只看该作者
选A对不?
地板
发表于 2010-12-25 16:05:36 | 只看该作者
D为什么是对的呢?
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-12-25 19:18:06 | 只看该作者
答案是A,思路是怎样的?
6#
发表于 2010-12-26 07:02:41 | 只看该作者
原文结论是Amphibian populations的降低是由于臭氧层被更严重的破坏了。推理是Amphibian populations很容易遭受UV-B的伤害,能阻隔这种UV-B的臭氧层在过去的50年里持续下降了。问选项中哪个没有加强这种逻辑。BCE都是更强的建立了Amphibian populations和UV-B或者和臭氧层的关系,D是排除他因来巩固文中提出的解释因素。A选项引入了被臭氧阻隔的其他射线,无关。
7#
发表于 2010-12-28 21:29:52 | 只看该作者
同意楼上。出现了无关信息
8#
发表于 2010-12-29 15:00:24 | 只看该作者
学习了
9#
发表于 2010-12-29 15:49:54 | 只看该作者
A选项,就算不是only type,对于结论丝毫没有影响。所以既没有加强也没有削弱,属于无关。
10#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-12-29 16:09:11 | 只看该作者
A选项,就算不是only type,对于结论丝毫没有影响。所以既没有加强也没有削弱,属于无关。
-- by 会员 Melodyyang90 (2010/12/29 15:49:54)



为什么没有影响呢?这个光线确实能损伤基因,这个跟原文的说法一致啊
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-4-6 01:06
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部