- UID
- 509994
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2010-2-9
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
Which of the following, if true, provides evidence that most logically completes the argument below?
According to a widely held economic hypothesis, imposing strict environmental regulations reduces economic growth.This hypothesis is undermined by the fact that the states with the strictest environmental regulations also have the highest economic growth.This fact does not show that environmental regulations promote growth, however, since ______.
A.those states with the strictest environmental regulations invest the most in education and job training 前面有人讨论说,a通过提出他因来削弱原结论:环境保护促进经济增长。但是a的投资到教育和工作培训就一定促进经济增长吗?这个地方有点想不通
B.even those states that have only moderately strict environmental regulations have higher growth than those with the least-strict regulations C.many states that are experiencing reduced economic growth are considering weakening their environmental regulations 我选的是c:经历经济增长下降的国家正考虑削减环境保护,因为如果环境保护能促进经济增长,这些国家就不会采取这样的做法了,不是削弱了原结论吗?
D.after introducing stricter environmental regulations, many states experienced increased economic growth E.even those states with very weak environmental regulations have experienced at least some growth
答案是E,个人感觉不能起到削弱原结论的作用:有可能环境保护更强的国家经济增长更快
请各位nn帮忙看看,解答一下
|
|