ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Environmentalist: Snowmobiles in the park north of Milville create unacceptable levels of air pollution and should be banned. Milville Business Spokesperson: Snowmobiling brings many out-of-towners to Milville in the winter months, to the great direct financial benefit of many local residents. In addition, the money the town collects in fees for the recreational use of the park indirectly benefits all Milville residents. So, it is basic economics for us to put up with the pollution.

Which of the following, if true, could best be used by the environmentalist to counter the business spokesperson's argument?

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 6136|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

prep 81

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-5-6 12:14:40 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
81.(29110-!-item-!-188;#058&003820)



Environmentalist:Snowmobiles in the park north of Milville create unacceptable levels of air pollution and should be banned.

Milville Business Spokesperson:Snowmobiling brings many out-of-towners to Milville in the winter months, to the great direct financial benefit of many local residents.In addition, the money the town collects in fees for the recreational use of the park indirectly benefits all Milville residents.So, it is basic economics for us to put up with the pollution.

Which of the following, if true, could best be used by the environmentalist to counter the business spokesperson’s argument?

A. A great many cross-country skiers are now kept from visiting Milville by the noise and pollution that snowmobiles generate.

B. Not all of the people who go snowmobiling in the vicinity of Milville are from out of town.

C. Snowmobiles, because they run on two-cycle engines, emit greater amounts of hydrocarbons and particulate matter than cars do.

D. Industrial pollution in Milville has been significantly reduced in the past few years without any adverse effect on the town’s economy.

E. Many Milville residents object to having to pay fees for recreational use of the park in the winter.

正确答案是A,我选了D。要反对business spokesperson,就是反对So, it is basic economics for us to put up with the pollution. 而D不正能提供异因同果削弱--能减污染但不影响经济?反观A是削弱business spokesperson‘s的前提,但spokesperson的前提并不是他的推测,怎么能反对。请高人指点。谢谢!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-5-6 13:11:19 | 只看该作者
D无关啊,跟工业污染有什么关系?你不能想当然地认为industrial pollution没有用到economy就降低了,则snowmobile的污染也能够不用economy就能降低。这两个虽然都是pollution但是毫无关系。比如,原文说:成年人要长高需要服用钙。而选项说:发育中的小孩,他不服用钙也会自然长高。你说这两个有驳斥作用吗?
板凳
发表于 2010-12-5 21:00:06 | 只看该作者
D的 industrial pollution 和题干的 snowmobile air pollution 讨论范围没有交集 所以错。选项A正好削弱了 business spokesperson.所以选A.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-23 13:14
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部