ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2715|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

这题怎么看不太懂呀?求助~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-12-4 16:02:13 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
George Bernard Shaw wrote: “That any sane nation, having observed that you could provide for the supply of bread by giving bakers a pecuniary interest in baking for you, should go on to give a surgeon a pecuniary interest in cutting off your leg is enough to make one despair of political humanity.”
Shaw’s statement would best serve as an illustration in an argument criticizing which of the following?
(A) Dentists who perform unnecessary dental work in order to earn a profit
(B) Doctors who increase their profits by specializing only in diseases that affect a large percentage of the population
(C) Grocers who raise the price of food in order to increase their profit margins
(D) Oil companies that decrease the price of their oil in order to increase their market shareA
(E) Bakers and surgeons who earn a profit by supplying other peoples’ basic needs

为何答案是A呢?小弟选了D,求指教~
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2010-12-4 18:07:31 | 只看该作者
继续顶~
板凳
发表于 2010-12-4 20:00:32 | 只看该作者
the cash nexus between u and baker is based on the interesting of bread, but that nexus between u and a surgeon is "not" based on the intereting of cutting leg off.  (so as to the analogue of dentist)


open to discuss
地板
发表于 2010-12-4 23:24:43 | 只看该作者
我觉得这要道题关键要看作者的态度, 这个类比是为了达到某种目的而做什么事儿又损害了别人的利益,作者的态度是negative的, A最合适了。
5#
发表于 2010-12-5 02:01:00 | 只看该作者
LS is right.

In essence, the argument is the following: You can do things that benefit your own interest. But you cannot do things that harm other's interest while benefiting yourself.

"[G]ive a surgeon a pecuniary interest in cutting off your leg" is similar to let a "[d]entists perform unnecessary dental work in order to earn a profit", both of which the augument is criticizing.

On the other hand, "you could provide for the supply of bread by giving bakers a pecuniary interest in baking for you" is not a viewpoint that the argument criticizes. Answer D "Oil companies that decrease the price of their oil in order to increase their market share" is, on the whole, minding their own business without apparently harming anyone else.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-8 21:54
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部