XDF小兰 p82 212

mirandatsui · 发表于 2010-10-19 23:14:49

In the course of her researches, a historian recently found two documents mentioning the same person, Erich Schnitzler. One, dated May 3, 1739, is a record of Schnitzler's arrest for peddling without a license. The second, undated, is a statement by Schnitzler asserting that he has been peddling off and on for 20 years.
Best suppor the following conclusions?

C. The undated document was written before 1765.

为何选C呢？我觉得某个地方我中文翻译错了。求解，谢谢。

YuanHuang · 发表于 2010-10-19 23:48:22

What do you mean by "best support for the following conclusions?". If I'm guessing right, the question is asking us to draw a conclusion based on the information given in the passage. The passage gives two premises: 1. Schnitzler being arrested in 1739, 2. Schnitzler has been peddling for 20 years + - 1739. Therefore, the conclusion C makes sense, unless there are other choices that you think make more sense.

XDF小兰 p82 212

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

浏览过的版块