- UID
- 476385
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2009-9-22
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
Historians who study European women of the Renaissance try to measure “independence,” “options,” and other indicators of the degree to which the expression of women’s individuality was either permitted or suppressed. Influenced by Western individualism, these historians define a peculiar form of personhood:an innately bounded unit, autonomous and standing apart from both nature and society. An anthropologist, however, would contend that a person can be conceived in ways other than as an “individual.”In many societies a person’s identity is not intrinsically unique and self-contained but instead is defined within a complex web of social relationships.
In her study of the fifteenth-century Florentine widow Alessandra Strozzi, a historian who specializes in European women of the Renaissance attributes individual intention and authorship of actions to her subject.This historian assumes that Alessandra had goals and interests different from those of her sons, yet much of the historian’s own research reveals that Alessandra acted primarily as a champion of her sons’ interests, taking their goals as her own.Thus Alessandra conforms more closely to the anthropologist’s notion that personal motivation is embedded in a social context.Indeed, one could argue that Alessandra did not distinguish her personhood from that of her sons.In Renaissance Europe the boundaries of the conceptual self were not always firm and closed and did not necessarily coincide with the boundaries of the bodily self.
这个是讲述文艺复兴时期女权方面的问题，但是看了半天没看明白，哪儿好心人帮我解释一下，小女子感激涕零啊~！！！
|
|
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2010-8-10 16:45:53
收藏
收藏
