ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4574|回复: 12
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教GWD25-Q27

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-7-17 15:13:00 | 只看该作者

请教GWD25-Q27

 GWD-25-Q25-Q28

   In mid-February 1917
                                    
a
        

women’s movement independent   

of political affiliation erupted in

    New York City, the stronghold of

(5) the Socialist party in the United

   states. Protesting against the high    

   cost of living, thousands of women   

   refused to buy chickens, fish, and

   vegetables. The boycott shut.

(10) down much of the City’s foodstuffs

    marketing for two weeks, riveting   

    public attention on the issue of       

    food prices, which had increased

    partly as a result of increased

(15) exports of food to Europe that had

    been occurring since the outbreak

of the First World War.

   
                            
By early 1917 the Socialist

party had established itself as a

(20) major political presence in New

York
                            City
. New York Socialists,     

whose customary spheres of          

    struggle were electoral work and      

    trade union organizing, seized the

(25) opportunity and quickly organized

an extensive series of cost-of-

living protests designed to direct

the women’s movement toward

Socialist goals. Underneath the       

(30) Socialists’ brief commitment to

cost-of-living organizing lay a

basic indifference to the issue

itself. While some Socialists did      

view price protests as a direct        

(35) step toward socialism, most         

Socialists ultimately sought to

divert  the cost-of-living movement

into alternative channels of protest.

Union organizing, they argued,       

(40) was the best method through which    

to combat the high cost of living.

For others, cost-of-living or oganiz-    

ing was
                            
valuable insofar as it led
      

women into the struggle for suf-       

(45) frage, and similarly, the suffrage       

struggle was valuable insofar as

it moved United States society

one step closer to socialism.

   
                            
Although
                        
New York’s Social-

(50) ists saw the cost-of-living issue      

as, at best ,secondary or tertiary      

to the real task at hand, the boy-

cotters, by sharp contrast, joined

the price protest movement out of

(55) an urgent and deeply felt commit-

ment to the cost-of-living issue.

A shared experience of swiftly       

declining living standards caused

by rising food prices drove these

(60) women to protest. Consumer

    organizing spoke directly to their     

daily lives and concerns; they

saw cheaper food as a valuable

end in itself. Food price protests

(65) were these women’s way of orga-

nizing at their own workplace, as

workers whose occupation was

shopping and preparing food for

their families.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q27

Which of the following best states the function of the passage as a whole?

A. To contrast the views held by the Socialist party and by the boycotting women of New York City on the cost-of-living issue

B. To analyze the assumptions underlying opposing viewpoints within the New York Socialist party of 1917

C. To provide a historical perspective on different approaches to the resolution of the cost-of-living issue.

D.  To chronicle the sequence of events that led to the New York Socialist party’s emergence as a political power

E. To analyze the motivations behind the Socialist party’s involvement in the women’s suffrage movement.

答案是c,我选了a。c中的historical perspective以及different approaches到底在文中那里体现?a又错在哪呢?

还请nn指教。

沙发
发表于 2009-7-17 22:19:00 | 只看该作者
 Union organizing, they argued, was the best method through which to combat the high cost of living.这是部分社会主义者认为对抗高物价的方法,而妇女的做法是 refused to buy chickens, fish, and vegetables这就是different approaches啊。

至于A,用关键词提炼选项:To contrast the views  on the cost-of-living issue,如果是对的,请至少告诉我两种观点。如果你无法说出,那么就是错的。

希望有所帮助。


[此贴子已经被作者于2009/7/17 23:02:09编辑过]
板凳
发表于 2009-8-2 20:51:00 | 只看该作者
那E是错在哪里呢?全文不都是在说社会主义者的动机----发展更多的社会主义者吗?请指点!
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2009-8-10 21:20:00 | 只看该作者

这个帖子被回复了我为什么没有收到消息。。。

e我乍一看也没看出来。。。后来才发现主题不对了。e说的是妇女选举权(suffrage)运动背后socialist party的动机,是错误的。因为整篇文章妇女都只是为了物价而斗争。选举权是socialist party的想法。


[此贴子已经被作者于2009/8/10 21:23:08编辑过]
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-8-10 21:29:00 | 只看该作者
忘了感谢2楼的GG,你的话很有启发!
6#
发表于 2009-8-10 21:41:00 | 只看该作者
但是我想问问各位....a history perspective是什么呢?作者对两种观点并没有进行自己的叙述啊
7#
发表于 2009-8-14 16:35:00 | 只看该作者
我想请问C选项怎么翻译????
8#
发表于 2009-8-16 21:01:00 | 只看该作者

我想问的是:

For others, cost-of-living or oganiz-    

ing was
                            
valuable insofar as it led
      

women into the struggle for suf-       

(45) frage, and similarly, the suffrage       

struggle was valuable insofar as

it moved United States society

one step closer to socialism.

这段说明了什么?  我实在无法理解。。。

还有,

the boy-

cotters, by sharp contrast, joined

the price protest movement out of

(55) an urgent and deeply felt commit-

ment to the cost-of-living issue.

应该做何解释?我就是把每个字都翻出来,但意思还是不对味。。。

谢谢啦~~~

cotters, by sharp contrast, joined

the price protest movement out of

(55) an urgent and deeply felt commit-

ment to the cost-of-living issue.

应该做何解释?我就是把每个字都翻出来,但意思还是不对味。。。

谢谢啦~~~

9#
发表于 2009-9-12 20:12:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用美小波在2009/8/16 21:01:00的发言:

我想问的是:

For others, cost-of-living or oganiz-    

ing was
       
valuable insofar as it led
      

women into the struggle for suf-       

(45) frage, and similarly, the suffrage       

struggle was valuable insofar as

it moved United States society

one step closer to socialism.

这段说明了什么?  我实在无法理解。。。

还有,

对另一些社会主义者, 针对生活成本的抗议, 可以引导妇女去争取选举权,

而这有助于美国社会向社会主义的方向更近了一步.

the boy-

cotters, by sharp contrast, joined

the price protest movement out of

(55) an urgent and deeply felt commit-

ment to the cost-of-living issue.

应该做何解释?我就是把每个字都翻出来,但意思还是不对味。。。

谢谢啦~~~

相对于社会主义者将抗议物价视作第二或者第三重要的目标, 加入抵制购买的

妇女的目标却是实实在在的针对希望物价降低这个具体问题.

cotters, by sharp contrast, joined

the price protest movement out of

(55) an urgent and deeply felt commit-

ment to the cost-of-living issue.

应该做何解释?我就是把每个字都翻出来,但意思还是不对味。。。

谢谢啦~~~

相对于社会主义者将抗议物价视作第二或者第三重要的目标, 加入抵制购买的

妇女的目标却是实实在在的针对希望物价降低这个具体问题.


[此贴子已经被作者于2009/9/12 20:13:02编辑过]
10#
发表于 2009-9-22 22:47:00 | 只看该作者
顶一下。实在看不出文章里有two different approaches to the resolution.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-7-1 01:01
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部