ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 662|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教大家两道prep09逻辑

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-9-19 16:12:12 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
这两道题有点类似,第一道似乎在哪里看到过,本人逻辑巨差无比,做题又慢,错误率又时常在一半左右,9.28一战,寻求解释!谢谢各位大牛!
第一题:
Which of the following most logically completes the passage?



Concerned about the financial well-being of its elderly citizens, the government of Runagia decided two years ago to increase by 20 percent the government-provided pension paid to all Runagians over 65.Inflation in the intervening period has been negligible, and the increase has been duly received by all eligible Runagians.Nevertheless, many of them are no better off financially than they were before the increase, in large part because __________.


A. they rely entirely on the government pension for their income


B. Runagian banks are so inefficient that it can take up to three weeks to cash a pension check



C. they buy goods whose prices tend to rise especially fast in times of inflation



D. the pension was increased when the number of elderly Runagians below the poverty level reached an all-time high



E. in Runagia children typically supplement the income of elderly parents, but only by enough to provide them with a comfortable living




答案E,但总想不通为什么。

第二题:
Two years ago, the government of Runagia increased by 20 percent the government-provided pensions paid to Runagians over 65.The aim of the increase was to stimulate the economy in the rural regions of the country, where most pension recipients live.Statistics, however, show that there has been no increase in economic activity in those regions since then, but that there has been noticeably more spending in the urban areas.


Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain why the increase resulted in the unintended state of affairs described?


A. Until the pensions were increased, many Runagians over 65 in rural regions had been receiving support from their children who live in urban areas.
B. The pensions were increased when the number of people below the poverty level in rural areas of Runagia reached an all-time high.
C. City-dwellers in Runagia rarely travel to rural regions of the country.
D. The Runagian postal system is so inefficient that it can take up to three weeks for pension checks to reach recipients in rural areas.
E. On average, the pensions were higher in rural than in urban areas before the increase.

答案:A ,但我觉得没一个对的,A里面pension提高之前靠孩子救济,那么pension提高之后应该自己负担的能力加强了啊,怎么还会增加在urban area的spending呢,真是悲剧。。。







Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain why the increase resulted in the unintended state of affairs described?


A. Until the pensions were increased, many Runagians over 65 in rural regions had been receiving support from their children who live in urban areas.
B. The pensions were increased when the number of people below the poverty level in rural areas of Runagia reached an all-time high.
C. City-dwellers in Runagia rarely travel to rural regions of the country.
D. The Runagian postal system is so inefficient that it can take up to three weeks for pension checks to reach recipients in rural areas.
E. On average, the pensions were higher in rural than in urban areas before the increase.

答案:A ,但我觉得没一个对的,A里面pension提高之前靠孩子救济,那么pension提高之后应该自己负担的能力加强了啊,怎么还会增加在urban area的spending呢,真是悲剧。。。









收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-9-19 16:23:08 | 只看该作者
这里两题的意思都是说
超过65岁的老人在政府增加补贴前靠儿女赡养
在政府增加补贴后由于儿女只保证老人的生活comfortable 因此给老人的生活费则会适量减少
于是造成了    第一题的老人并没比以前过的更好    第二题的城内消费提高
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-9-19 16:40:01 | 只看该作者
多谢楼上!第一题是理解了,可是第二题还是不理解。。。这跟城内消费有啥关系?。。。我真是无药可救了。。。
地板
发表于 2010-9-19 17:31:36 | 只看该作者
第二题顺着第一题的思路往下想

原来是住在城里的孩子负责供养65岁以上的老人
现在政府给老人的补贴多了,老人就不需要孩子那么多钱了
孩子的闲钱多了,就跑去消费了,所以城里的消费增长了。
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-9-19 17:41:39 | 只看该作者
终于算是弄懂了,但我自己做怎么也不能往这个方向想,是不是我脑子有问题.....
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-6 06:54
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部