ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Community activist: If Morganville wants to keep its central shopping district healthy, it should prevent the opening of a huge SaveAll discount department store on the outskirts of Morganville. Records from other small towns show that whenever SaveAll has opened a store outside the central shopping district of a small town, within fi ve years the town has experienced the bankruptcies of more than a quarter of the stores in the shopping district.

The answer to which of the following would be most useful for evaluating the community activist's reasoning?

正确答案: C

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3872|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG 72 ??

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-10-12 19:45:04 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
72. Community activist: If Morganville wants to keep its central shopping district healthy, it should prevent the
opening of a huge SaveAll discount department store on the outskirts of Morganville. Records from other small
towns show that whenever SaveAll has opened a store outside the central shopping district of a small town,
within fi ve years the town has experienced the bankruptcies of more than a quarter of the stores in the shopping
district.
The answer to which of the following would be most useful for evaluating the community activist’s reasoning?
(A) Have community activists in other towns successfully campaigned against the opening of a SaveAll store
on the outskirts of their towns?
(B) Do a large percentage of the residents of Morganville currently do almost all of their shopping at stores in
Morganville?
(C) In towns with healthy central shopping districts, what proportion of the stores in those districts suffer
bankruptcy during a typical fi ve-year period?
(D) What proportion of the employees at the SaveAll store on the outskirts of Morganville will be drawn from
Morganville?
(E) Do newly opened SaveAll stores ever lose money during their fi rst fi ve years of operation?
答案是C, 为什么B不对?  

OG说对B取非的结果页一样。 可是如果本来就没有什么人在那买东西的话, 开不开也无所谓了吧
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-10-13 13:23:34 | 只看该作者
都没什么人买东西了,那还叫healthy central shopping district么
板凳
发表于 2010-10-13 21:54:03 | 只看该作者
题目问得是如何评价community activist’s reasoning,而他说只要SaveAll开店,五年内导致25%其他店关门,C就是要调查这二者间的因果关系是否成立;而B是无关选项,Morganville居民是否在Morganville购物看似有影响力,但实际上这并不影响论点SaveAll开店导致其他店关门,因为问题焦点不是在分析顾客群体来源,换言之即使全是外地顾客(或者全是当地居民)光临Morganville central shopping districts又如何?还是不能判断SaveAll开店是否是导致其他店关门的原因。
地板
发表于 2010-10-13 23:00:48 | 只看该作者
文章说 只要S开店,好多比例的其他店要关门 所以为了有一个健康的市场 就不要S开店
要evaluate 就是要看选项所说的 是不是可以达到这个目的
B说 是不是很大一部分的人都在M这个地区里的商店里面买东西
如果这个问题的答案是 YES 那么还存在下一个问题 就是 这部分人是不是在Morganville central shopping districts里的SaveAll买东西 对这个问题的回答才对activist's reasoning有影响
如果对B选项的问题的回答是 NO 那么就更是无关了
我觉OG12 CR49 的E 与你说的B有异曲同工之处..个人拙见....
5#
发表于 2012-5-6 15:24:54 | 只看该作者
但是C选项说的是 在购物中心健康的镇,5年内倒闭店铺的比例是多少。 原文不是已经说了根据纪录,有四分之一的店铺倒闭吗?想要评价的这个问题已经解决了,为什么还要评价?
6#
发表于 2012-5-6 20:16:19 | 只看该作者
四分之一那个记录是特指 SaveAll discount department 开店活动影响的地方,那么对比healthy area可以评估这家百货商场开店时候影响当地的商店的到比率。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-29 11:16
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部