请教各位大牛大侠cxd假设13

w2222w · 发表于 2008-3-10 22:37:00

in any negotiations between a party with limited aims and an opposing party with unlimited aims, the party with limited aims is bound to lose. this is so because the scope of a negotiation party's aims determines the energy and the perseverance that will be brought to the negotiations by that party which of the following is an assumption implicit in the passage above?

a the intensity with which parties conduct negotiations affects the outcome of those negotiations

d a negotiator who has exceptionally high aims needs exceptional perseverance in otder to avoid losing

答案是a 可文章也没提呀intensity 思路是什么 d为什么错了

[此贴子已经被作者于2008-3-12 14:34:53编辑过]

w2222w · 发表于 2008-3-12 14:29:00

帮看下

w2222w · 发表于 2008-3-17 20:41:00

in any negotiations between a party with limited aims and an opposing party with unlimited aims, the party with limited aims is bound to lose<A>

because the scope of a negotiation party's aims determines the energy and the perseverance that will be brought to the negotiations by that party <B>

答案a是让a,b有联系架桥?intensity指the energy and the perseverance???查词典也没看出来这意思呀

d a negotiator who has exceptionally high aims needs exceptional perseverance in otder to avoid losing 这个看起来还像A可行呢哪能看出错呢起码表黄处原文还提过呢

b negotiations almost always pit against one another parties whose aims differ in scope 这个看起来也像B可行呢表黄处原文还提过

到底是咋回事呀???

ccorettaa · 发表于 2008-3-17 22:25:00

LZ也在做这本书啊
这道题我也错了，（我复习一周了，4月17日就考试，错的那叫爽啊，愁~）。没啥感觉，答案又没有分析，咱们一起探讨

题干中出现了3个概念：
1目标范围2谈判结果 3投入精力和耐性

其中，12建立了联系 13也建立了联系
        唯独缺少23之间的联系
        即谈判结果和投入精力耐性这两方面

这样看来A是好答案 intensity可否理解为精力和耐性的统称？

我开始选的也是D，可是目标的high 和 unlimited不是一个意思

这是我的看法
所以还是A好些

mandy_lulu · 发表于 2008-3-18 07:21:00

这题我做对的．我用原始的逻辑思维考虑的话就应该是Ａ．

结论是　this is so because the scope of a negotiating ...determines the energy and the perseverance that will be brought to the negotiations by that party.

the energy and the perseverance -intensity

D 只说了perserverance..

w2222w · 发表于 2008-3-19 10:27:00

energy+perseverane=intensity 原因

d起码说了 perserverance 不充分,必要也行吧!

racing78 · 发表于 2008-3-19 15:54:00

越多energy+preservance->贏面大

所以假設E跟P影響談判結果。如果這兩個因素對談判無影響，根本無法得出這樣的結論.

sd3195069 · 发表于 2008-3-19 22:40:00

D显然不对啊

假设架桥的话要绝对化,D中说的是他们in order to avoid losing,但这不表示他们一定就不lose啊

A的架桥就很绝对,affect!!!

你们讨论还真不在点啊......完全在谈些深奥的东西.....好复杂

w2222w · 发表于 2008-3-19 22:59:00

恩这个好像起码说服力大些之前没听说过是有点菜才开始么

多谢哈

杨东芳 · 发表于 2010-8-9 15:47:46

原文推理过程: 结论，将目标得范围做限制的一方和不做限制的一方谈判时，前者必定输。 A
原因，因为目标范围的大小决定着谈判方当时的精力和耐力。B
B-->A 模式，推理中有个gap，即耐力和精力和谈判结果输赢的关系，答案是第一个选项，说明谈判的强度影响谈判的输赢，这里我觉得强度就代表着谈判时所需的耐力和精力，而D选项中的exceptionally high aims 是无关选项。欢迎指正~~

请教各位大牛大侠cxd假设13