ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

A certain mayor has proposed a fee of five dollars per day on private vehicles entering the city, claiming that the fee will alleviate the city's traffic congestion. The mayor reasons that, since the fee will exceed the cost of round-trip bus fare from many nearby points, many people will switch from using their cars to using the bus.

Which of the following statements, if true, provides the best evidence that the mayor's reasoning is flawed?

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 8248|回复: 18
打印 上一主题 下一主题

prep1-59

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-6-1 21:03:00 | 只看该作者

prep1-59

59.   (34753-!-item-!-188;#058&007583)

 

A certain mayor has proposed a fee of five dollars per day on private vehicles entering the city, claiming that the fee will alleviate the city's traffic congestion.  The mayor reasons that, since the fee will exceed the cost of round-trip bus fare from many nearby points, many people will switch from using their cars to using the bus.

 

Which of the following statements, if true, provides the best evidence that the mayor's reasoning is flawed?

 

(A) Projected increases in the price of gasoline will increase the cost of taking a private vehicle into the city.

(B) The cost of parking fees already makes it considerably more expensive for most people to take a private vehicle into the city than to take a bus.

(C) Most of the people currently riding the bus do not own private vehicles.

(D) Many commuters opposing the mayor's plan have indicated that they would rather endure traffic congestion than pay a five-dollar-per day fee.

(E) During the average workday, private vehicles owned and operated by people living within the city account for twenty percent of the city's traffic congestion.

 开始看是直接把B给排除了,以为无关,后来看很有道理。看题目时我就在想选那项这点钱不算什么的,结果还是被迷惑了。以前好像没做过这么绕的,谁有见过类似题发上来看看好不

沙发
发表于 2007-6-1 22:05:00 | 只看该作者

手边没有其他例题。但总体解题感觉是寻找他因。参看lawyer的方法。

WEAKEN该结论的方法包括:A。是其他原因或可能导致该结果。B。割断因果:或有因无果或有果无因。C。因果颠倒了。D显示因果关系的资料不准确。

The mayor reasons that, since the fee will exceed the cost of round-trip bus fare from many nearby points, many people will switch from using their cars to using the bus.

板凳
发表于 2007-7-26 10:45:00 | 只看该作者
我是在B、D选项间徘徊。最终选了D,觉得它说得不是更直接么?不管政府收多少钱,开车的都不买帐…………
地板
发表于 2007-10-22 10:01:00 | 只看该作者

請問

那C呢?

C不是說 搭巴士是因為沒車 所以如果有車就不搭巴士了!?

也就是說 這與收費與否無關

大家覺得呢

請指正

5#
发表于 2007-11-11 18:29:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用zhangly在2007-7-26 10:45:00的发言:
我是在B、D选项间徘徊。最终选了D,觉得它说得不是更直接么?不管政府收多少钱,开车的都不买帐…………

个人认为:

这道题问的是:
Which of the following statements, if true, provides the best evidence that the mayor's reasoning is flawed?
是问的 这个推理的对不对

所以D选项Many commuters opposing the mayor's plan have indicated that they would rather endure traffic congestion than pay a five-dollar-per day fee.是无关的。跟前提条件 since the fee will exceed the cost of round-trip bus fare from many nearby points没有任何联系。

而C 选项 Most of the people currently riding the bus do not own private vehicles.

说的是目前做公交的都是没有车的,只是说的成公交的这一群体,而没有说开车的,所以是无关的

6#
发表于 2007-12-31 23:59:00 | 只看该作者

D 其实不对,d表达的是开车人宁愿堵车也不愿多付钱,重点是不愿付钱,题干表达的是,宁愿多付钱,开车人都不愿乘汽车

7#
发表于 2008-12-11 13:35:00 | 只看该作者

ding

8#
发表于 2009-6-26 11:16:00 | 只看该作者

B的意思是说既有的高昂停车费 即现在开车的人们已经接受这个高昂的费用 也就是说再在其他地方花费并不影响想在可以付停车费的人的选择

有一道类似的题 其文章的说法与本题差不多 正确的weaken选项就是人们很富有并不在乎多花一些钱

这种选项应该属于手段目的中承认A但反对B的断桥型

还有个疑问 对于E似乎也是削弱手段的效果 但不选E是因为削弱的不够彻底么


[此贴子已经被作者于2009-6-26 11:17:11编辑过]
9#
发表于 2009-7-16 16:22:00 | 只看该作者

同问,D和E错哪?

我个人觉得D 错在many,不够精确

E我就有点说不出来为什么错?

10#
发表于 2009-7-23 11:29:00 | 只看该作者
求解
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-28 05:01
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部