ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2268|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

prep上觉得答案有问题的~~请教各位

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-9-8 09:25:38 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
At present the Hollywood Restaurant has only standard-height tables.  However, many customers come to watch the celebrities who frequent the Hollywood, and they would prefer tall tables with stools because such seating would afford a better view of the celebrities.  Moreover, diners seated on stools typically do not stay as long as diners seated at standard-height tables.  Therefore, if the Hollywood replaced some of its seating with high tables and stools, its profits would increase.

The argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it gives reason to believe that it is likely that

(A) some celebrities come to the Hollywood to be seen, and so might choose to sit at the tall tables if they were available
(B) the price of meals ordered by celebrities dining at the Hollywood compensates for the longer time, if any, they spend lingering over their meals
(C) a customer of the Hollywood who would choose to sit at a tall table would be an exception to the generalization about lingering
(D) a restaurant's customers who spend less time at their meals typically order less expensive meals than those who remain at their meals longer
(E) with enough tall tables to accommodate all the Hollywood's customers interested in such seating, there would be no view except of other tall tables
答案是c,我觉得是d, 对结论increase profit的直接削弱

10.    (25259-!-item-!-188;#058&001774)

Jennifer:  Video rental outlets in Centerville together handled 10,000 fewer video rentals in 1994 than in 1993.  The decline in rentals was probably due almost entirely to the February 1994 opening of Videorama, the first and only video rental outlet in the area that, in addition to renting videos, also sold them cheaply.

Brad:  There must be another explanation:  as you yourself said, the decline was on the order of 10,000 rentals.  Yet Videorama sold only 4,000 videos in 1994.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the force of the objection that Brad presents to Jennifer's explanation?

(A) In 1994 Videorama rented out more videos than it sold.
(B) In 1994 two new outlets that rent but that do not sell videos opened in Centerville.
(C) Most of the video rental outlets in Centerville rent videos at a discount on certain nights of the week.
(D) People often buy videos of movies that they have previously seen in a theater.
(E) People who own videos frequently loan them to their friends.
答案是e, 我选A 题目对Brad的削弱,说明还是Videorama得原因,只不过它rent的更多
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-9-8 13:00:04 | 只看该作者
第十题 A选项并没有什么关系,E解释了为什么出租数量的减少大于销售数量,但是销售仍然是当地总租出数量减少的原因,Centerville是一个地名 Videorama 是那个地方的一个outlet,如果没有销售的存在的话,当地的出租量是应该不会变得,Videorama得出租两的变化,只可能对其他outlet的出租量产生影响,只有销售的出现才使得Centerville当地对出租的需求量减小了
板凳
发表于 2010-9-8 15:14:52 | 只看该作者
前一题我是这么认为的,D中说的是会点更便宜的,但是没人告诉你“便宜食物带来的利润更低”,C中则说去Hollywood坐高桌子上的人会是一般地坐高桌子上的人的一个例外,亦即并不会坐的时间更短
地板
发表于 2010-9-8 22:20:22 | 只看该作者
后一题我开始也错了,和LZ一样选了A. 后来我是这样想通的:

先看Brad的response: 他说C家比前一年少租出10000张vedio,但V家却只卖出4000张,(中间存在了6000张差额无法解释),因此Brad认为:There must be another explanation.

A: V家rent出去的vedio比sold出去的更多,除了售出的4000张,还有更多的出租,不是恰恰支持了Brad所说的another explanation嘛~~
5#
发表于 2010-9-8 22:43:59 | 只看该作者
第一道题
文章说:1.人们更想要tall tables,2. 坐在stools上的客人比standard tables 的客人用时少
  所以:用high table and stools可以带来更多的利润。
C项:坐在high table上的客人是个例外,也就是说这些客人用时不会比standard tables 的客人少,消弱了第二点
D 项:用时少,花钱比用时多的少。但是这与standard table 和 high tables没有关系。而且文章也没说high tables 的用时比standard tables的少。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-12 22:56
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部