[求助]大全-18-5

5.     Under current federal law, employers are allowed to offer their employees free parking spaces as a tax-free benefit, but they can offer employees only up to $180 per year as a tax-free benefit for using mass transit. The government could significantly increase mass transit ridership by raising the limit of this benefit to meet commuters’ transportation costs.

The proposal above to increase mass transit ridership assumes that

(A) current mass transit systems are subject to unexpected route closings and delays

(B) using mass transit creates less air pollution per person than using a private automobile

(C) the parking spaces offered by employers as tax-free benefits can be worth as much as $2,500 per year

(D) many employees are deterred by financial considerations from using mass transit to commute to their places of employment（D）

(E) because of traffic congestion on major commuter routes, it is often faster to travel to one’s place of employment by means of mass transit than by private automobile

请问这里D为什么对? 有一点想不通, D说由于经济上的考虑阻碍了许多员工使用公共交通工具, 那是不是意味着开私车的费用要比公共交通工具来得便宜?谢谢!

谢谢cranberry的答复。我原来想的思路，这个财务方面的考量有两种理解，一种是节约了成本，另一种是获得了更多的受益。C是暗含相对而言自行开车在获得更多的受益。而D的说法是不是有我上一帖说的隐含意思？如果有岂不很奇怪？

嗨，草莓给的解释很清楚了，呵呵，再给你个例子

在上海每天从浦西去浦东堵的要死，我们老板每天坚持坐地铁来上班，前提是他的车放在家里睡大觉，周末才开

因为实在是太堵了，所以开不开车不一定是从金钱角度考虑，还有很多方面啊

ps，前面是个真实的故事，呵呵，且勿外传

老大，谁说cranberry是草莓？再说我是草莓我和你急

啊真是谢谢番茄炒蛋了。这样讲明白多了！发现自己的思路原来很窄啊

p.s. cranberry 是什么莓，一般各种莓我都很喜欢的，象蓝莓啦，有没有买的啊？

呵呵，不说草莓了，哪敢得罪斑竹啊

PS。TO les，逻辑里面多举一些例子很有助于理解题意，关键就是看你是否能够找到恰当的例子。纯逻辑的分析方法当然是以一挡百，可是在理解上会有一定的难度。

大家讨论题目，不用谢了，草莓以前也很帮我，呵呵，是蓝莓