ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 789|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

狗狗AI高频!延长寿命那题该怎么写啊~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-8-11 21:54:16 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Although most people wish to live long lives, attempting to significantly extend the average human life span would be a mistake. If achieved, this would place an enormous burden on resources, lowering the quality of life for everyone.
虽然大多数人都希望长命百岁,但试图延长人类的平均寿命是错误的。如果实现了,这将对资源造成很大的负担,从而会降低每个人的生活质量。


应该怎么写呢。。。没有思路啊。。。难道是完全同意?? 还是让步同意??? 总觉得没有什么材料好写。。。 请指点迷经!!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-8-11 23:29:39 | 只看该作者
我的思路是让步同意
不可以无限延长,否则就会违背自然法则,资源就那么多,人越来越多,最后只能是吃不饱穿不暖,不幸福不安康
但是呢,有些情况要延长的,比如小朋友得了病,我们要救治并且尽量延长她的姓名,因为她是希望,是未来
还有些情况,也需要延长,比如科学家,他们活的时间越长越能为社会创造价值,对社会好
所以,部分同意
板凳
发表于 2010-8-11 23:35:30 | 只看该作者
我攒了一篇,你看看能用上不


With the fast development of medical technology, many diseases can be easily cured and life has been prolonged compared to ancient times, there is no doubt that people wish to live longer. However, what if, by the end of this century, we could more than double average life-span to more than 200 years? Given this possibility, there are issues that should be thoroughly discussed and debated.  As far as I am concerned, just like coins have two sides, we have to view the things in different angles.
First of all, the rule that “anyone will die in the long run” naturally keeps the balance of the ecosphere. If the life-span can be prolonged , one of the direct consequence is the population of our planet will increase dramatically and the number of people may become so large that it exceeds the carrying capacity of the planet, making life miserable for the vast majority of humans, even sowing the seeds for our own destruction. For example, there are limited lands for us to cultivate food plants, in this case, there must be one day that we will not be able to feed everybody. Finally people will die from hunger.    
Secondly, the quality of life for very old people may be severely diminished if changing the boundaries of aging is not accompanied by reasonably good health.  Certain Tissues and organs may deteriorate even as life-span is markedly prolonged, so old people may live with ever-worsening sight, hearing, mental functions. Meanwhile, we might be expected to work, support ourselves. This would likely to create intense adversarial relations between younger and older persons as they compete for limited jobs and resources.
However, we need to admittedly that there are good sides if the life-span has been prolonged. Our society may achieve greater success if people could live longer. As we all know that knowledge and experiences are accumulated with people growing older. There will be more master pieces if those scientists could live longer.
To sum up, although there are some advantages for average life-span being pro-longed, the disadvantages have over weigh the advantages.  Since our planet has limited sources, and make people not living so miserable and struggling, to pro-long life span is a good will, but it will turned out to be disaster when to achieve the extreme.
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2010-8-11 23:38:17 | 只看该作者
谢谢楼上两位~ 受教!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-6 23:22
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部