因为在XDF上课的时候，老师说arg和issue不一样，因为issue没有标准答案，但是arg是有标准答案的 可是我觉得很多arg的可攻击点很多啊... 下面是本月狗狗 AA1：The following appeared as part of a plan proposed by an executive of the Easy Credit Company to the president. “The Easy Credit Company would gain an advantage over competing credit card services if we were to donate a portion of the proceeds from the use of our cards to a well-known environmental organization in exchange for the use of its symbol or logo on our card. Since a recent poll shows that a large percentage of the public is concerned about environmental issues, this policy would attract new customers, increase use among existing customers, and enable us to charge interest rates that are higher than the lowest ones available.” Discuss how well reasoned... etc. 黄金80里的，范文和提纲里面的攻击点是收益不一定能cover捐款，还有收取利息与顾客增多没有必然联系等等 但是我写的时候分别攻击了：1.错误的因果关系，关系环保不一定就会带入消费偏好中 2.过去推将来，可能public关注的热点很快就转移了 3.可疑调查，没有给出pool的sufficient information... 马上就考试了，发现这种问题...头痛...
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2010-7-24 10:35:37
收藏
收藏
楼主