ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

At present the Hollywood Restaurant has only standard-height tables. However, many customers come to watch the celebrities who frequent the Hollywood, and they would prefer tall tables with stools because such seating would afford a better view of the celebrities. Moreover, diners seated on stools typically do not stay as long as diners seated at standard-height tables. Therefore, if the Hollywood replaced some of its seating with high tables and stools, its profits would increase.
The argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it gives reason to believe that it is likely that

正确答案: C

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 5162|回复: 11
打印 上一主题 下一主题

ordprep-cr2-17

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-12-7 19:22:52 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式


17.(26864-!-item-!-188;#058&003368)



At present the Hollywood Restaurant has only standard-height tables.However, many customers come to watch the celebrities who frequent the Hollywood, and they would prefer tall tables with stools because such seating would afford a better view of the celebrities.Moreover, diners seated on stools typically do not stay as long as diners seated at standard-height tables.Therefore, if the Hollywood replaced some of its seating with high tables and stools, its profits would increase.



The argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it gives reason to believe that it is likely that



(A) some celebrities come to the Hollywood to be seen, and so might choose to sit at the tall tables if they were available

(B) the price of meals ordered by celebrities dining at the Hollywood compensates for the longer time, if any, they spend lingering over their meals

(C) a customer of the Hollywood who would choose to sit at a tall table would be an exception to the generalization about lingering

(D) a restaurant's customers who spend less time at their meals typically order less expensive meals than those who remain at their meals longer

(E) with enough tall tables to accommodate all the Hollywood's customers interested in such seating, there would be no view except of other tall tables
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2010-12-8 10:56:24 | 只看该作者
UP
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-12-8 17:35:28 | 只看该作者
求解释啊~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
地板
发表于 2010-12-8 18:00:17 | 只看该作者
点便宜的菜比较多应该和总体利润下降不能等同吧,可以点很多量的,或者便宜的菜也有足够的利润呢。。。
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-12-8 23:00:05 | 只看该作者
能详细点么 还是没懂啊
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-12-11 17:44:26 | 只看该作者
UP
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-12-15 22:59:16 | 只看该作者
UP
8#
发表于 2010-12-16 02:12:29 | 只看该作者
选D吗?
9#
发表于 2010-12-16 05:06:27 | 只看该作者
The answer is C.

First of all, this is a paradox question and the question stem asks you to find the criticism.  So let's analyze the argument.

Premises:
1) Customers come to Hollywood Restaurant to watch the celebrities so customrs would prefer tall tables to get a better view.
2) Diners seated on stools typically stay shorter than diners on regular seats.

Conclusion:
If the Hollywood replaced some of its seating with high tables and stools, its profits would increase.

Basically, the argument says that stools would attract more customers and customers sitting on stools turn over quickly.  Therefore, profits would be up.  Wait a minute.  Based on premise 1, if the customers are attracted to the restaraunt because they want to see celebrities, shouldn't they stay LONGER than normal customers? If so, it runs contrary to premise 2 which describes a general trend in customer's lingering behavior. The customer attracted might sit on the stools for a LONNNNNNNNNNNNNNG time without spending much on food. No turnover, no money!

C points out this paradox and C is the correct answer.
10#
发表于 2011-3-27 14:13:00 | 只看该作者
楼上的很强,但是为什么你都是in english的呢,不习惯啊。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-26 23:42
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部