ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 744|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

帮忙看看GWD逻辑题吧~谢谢!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-5-27 19:50:19 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
1.GWD-28-Q18
Which of the following most logically completes the passage?



Concerned about financial well-being of its elderly citizens, the government of Runagia decided two years ago to increase by 20 percent the government-provided pension paid to all Runagians over 65. Inflation in the intervening period has been negligible, and the increase has been duly received by all eligible Runagians. Nevertheless, many of them are no better off financially than they were before the increase, in large part because ______.



A: They rely entirely on the government pension for their income



B: Runagian banks are so inefficient that it can take up to three weeks to cash a pension check



C: They buy goods whose prices tend to rise especially fast in times of inflation



D: The pension was increased when the number of elderly Runagians below the poverty level reached an all-time high



E: In Runagia children typically supplement the income of elderly parents, but only by enough to provide them with a comfortable living
答案给的E,我选C,怎么感觉答案不对的呢!

1.GWD-29-Q8
Which of the following, if true, provides evidence that most logically completes the argument below?


According to a widely held economic hypothesis, imposing strict environmental regulations reduces economic growth.This hypothesis is undermined by the fact that the states with the strictest environmental regulations also have the highest economic growth.This fact does not show that environmental regulations promote growth, however, since ______.


  1. those states with the strictest environmental regulations invest the most in education and job training
  2. even those states that have only moderately strict environmental regulations have higher growth than those with the least-strict regulations
  3. many states that are experiencing reduced economic growth are considering weakening their environmental regulations
  4. after introducing stricter environmental regulations, many states experienced increased economic growth
  5. even those states with very weak environmental regulations have experienced at least some growth
    答案是A,我选择的B,谁能帮忙解释解释?谢谢O(∩_∩)O哈!


收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-5-27 19:59:58 | 只看该作者
Inflation in the intervening period has been negligible
所以c不对

http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_CR/thread-405876-1-1.html?SearchText=GWD%202%2012
讨论过的~~~
板凳
发表于 2010-5-27 20:01:25 | 只看该作者
把老人收入来源分割成:政府补贴+孩子的补贴。换言之,子女给父母的补助是看情况定的,刚够用就为止了,所以政府补贴多,他们就补贴少,导致老年人的总体收入没有大的变化。
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2010-5-27 20:06:11 | 只看该作者
再帮忙看看第二道题吧!谢着!
5#
发表于 2010-5-27 20:16:55 | 只看该作者
结论是 针对strictest environmental regulations 来说的  所以B无关
A之所以对,就是因为它经济好不是因为管制,而是由于其他原因。

你用argument的 他因来想想就知道了。当然这个他因必定要和关键词有关的 就是strictest environmental regulations
6#
发表于 2010-5-28 11:33:24 | 只看该作者
第二题可以当成削弱题来做,更好理解,严酷的环境政策对经济发展没有影响,则是他因在影响经济发展。。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-12-13 04:17
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部