ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Many people suffer an allergic reaction to certain sulfites, including those that are commonly added to wine as preservatives. However, since there are several wine makers who add sulfites to none of the wines they produce, people who would like to drink wine but are allergic to sulfites can drink wines produced by these wine makers without risking an allergic reaction to sulfites.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3138|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD 8-14 对SULFITE过敏这个,为什么选E呢?

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-9-7 23:48:00 | 只看该作者

GWD 8-14 对SULFITE过敏这个,为什么选E呢?

Many people suffer an allergic reaction to certain sulfites, including those that are commonly added to wine as preservatives.  However, since there are several wine makers who add sulfites to none of the wines they produce, people who would like to drink wine but are allergic to sulfites can drink wines produced by these wine makers without risking an allergic reaction to sulfites.

 

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

 

A.      These wine makers have been able to duplicate the preservative effect produced by adding sulfites by means that do not involve adding any potentially allergenic substances to their wine.

B.      Not all forms of sulfite are equally likely to produce the allergic reactions.

C.      Wine is the only beverage to which sulfites are commonly added.

D.      Apart from sulfites, there are no substances commonly present in wine that give rise to an allergic reaction.

E.      Sulfites are not naturally present in the wines produced by these wine makers in amounts large enough to produce an allergic reaction in someone who drinks these wines.

答案是E,但是文中说这些酒是不加SULFITE的,怎么E又说有了,只不过量不多?想来想去不知道为什么选E!

沙发
发表于 2006-9-8 01:18:00 | 只看该作者
notice "naturally present" in E.  the wine makers dont add sulfites, but what if sulfites already are in there by nature?


板凳
发表于 2006-9-8 08:32:00 | 只看该作者

同意楼上的说法.

地板
发表于 2009-7-28 09:56:00 | 只看该作者
up
5#
发表于 2012-12-9 19:31:00 | 只看该作者
我觉得如果E选项改成Naturally present sulfites in the wines produced by these wine makers are not in amounts large enough to produce an allergic reaction in someone who drinks these wines.会清楚很多
原句是are not...enough to...中间隔了好多内容,当时读选项是理解为这些sulfite不是naturally present,那就是人工加进去的,与题目矛盾,就排除了这个,也可能是我个人阅读不过关吧
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-9 01:27
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部