GWD-1- Q18 CR

gjjemily · 发表于 2010-5-5 19:46:51

GWD-1- Q18 CR

It is illegal to advertise prescription medications in Hedland except in professional medical journals or by mail directly to physicians. A proposed law would allow general advertising of prescription medications. Opponents object that, in general, laypersons lack the specialized knowledge to evaluate such advertisements and might ask their physicians for inappropriate medications. But since physicians have the final say as to whether to prescribe a medication for a patient, the objection provides no grounds for concern.

Which of the following would it be most useful to establish in order to evaluate the argument?

A.   Whether nonprescription medications can interact with and block the action of any prescription medications that could be advertised to the general public
B.   Whether most prescription medication advertisements directed at the general public would be advertisements for recently developed medications newly available by prescription
C.   Whether prescription medication advertisements directed at the general public would appear on television and radio as well as in print
D.   Whether physicians are more likely to pay attention to advertising directed to the general public than to advertising directed to physicians
E.   Whether physicians are likely to succumb to pressure from patients to prescribe inappropriate medications

答案选Ｅ
对该题答案没有什么异议，只是不懂最后一句话到底说的是什么意思，请教哦
最后一句是：But since physicians have the final say as to whether to prescribe a medication for a patient, the objection provides no grounds for concern.

peter3008 · 发表于 2010-6-17 05:49:13

But since physicians have the final say as to whether to prescribe a medication for a patient, the objection provides no grounds for concern.

但是由于医生由最后发表是否开药方给病人的意见，反对者没有考虑到这一点。大致意思就是这样，其实最后一句话读懂了，题目也做出来了，但是没有读懂，也不妨碍做题。

GWD-1- Q18 CR

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()