ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4804|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

猫猫求助各位XDJM~~GWD逻辑,感激ing

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-4-15 22:45:24 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
T-4-Q21
The OLEX Petroleum Company has recently determined that it could cut its refining costs by closing its Grenville refinery and consolidating all refining at its Tasberg refinery. Closing the Grenville refinery, however, would mean the immediate loss of about 1,200 jobs in the Grenville area. Eventually the lives of more than 10,000 people would be seriously disrupted. Therefore, OLEX’s decision, announced yesterday, to keep Grenville open shows that at OLEX social concerns sometimes outweigh the desire for higher profits.



Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument given?



A.The Grenville refinery, although it operates at a higher cost than the Tasberg refinery, has nevertheless been moderately profitable for many years.

B.Even though OLEX could consolidate all its refining at the Tasberg plant, doing so at the Grenville plant would not be feasible.

C.The Tasberg refinery is more favorably situated than the Grenville refinery with respect to the major supply routes for raw petroleum.

D.If the Grenville refinery were ever closed and operations at the Tasberg refinery expanded, job openings at Tasberg would to the extent possible be filled with people formerly employed at Grenville.

E.Closure of the Grenville refinery would mean compliance, at enormous cost, with demanding local codes regulating the cleanup of abandoned industrial sites.




T-4-Q38
In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking ordinances, a petition entitled “Petition for Statewide Smoking Restriction” is being circulated to voters by campaign workers who ask only, “Do you want to sign a petition for statewide smoking restriction?” The petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public.

Which of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated misleading to voters who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide?



A.Health costs associated with smoking cause health insurance premiums to rise for everyone and so affect nonsmokers.

B.In rural areas of the state, there are relatively few retail establishments and government offices that are open to the public.

C.The state law would supersede the local antismoking ordinances, which contain stronger bans than the state law does.

D.There is considerable sentiment among voters in most areas of the state for restriction of smoking.

E.The state law would not affect existing local ordinances banning smoking in places where the fire authorities have determined that smoking would constitute a fire hazard.



求助各位XDJM~~~感激ing


T-4-Q38
In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking ordinances, a petition entitled “Petition for Statewide Smoking Restriction” is being circulated to voters by campaign workers who ask only, “Do you want to sign a petition for statewide smoking restriction?” The petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public.

Which of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated misleading to voters who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide?



A.Health costs associated with smoking cause health insurance premiums to rise for everyone and so affect nonsmokers.

B.In rural areas of the state, there are relatively few retail establishments and government offices that are open to the public.

C.The state law would supersede the local antismoking ordinances, which contain stronger bans than the state law does.

D.There is considerable sentiment among voters in most areas of the state for restriction of smoking.

E.The state law would not affect existing local ordinances banning smoking in places where the fire authorities have determined that smoking would constitute a fire hazard.



求助各位XDJM~~~感激ing
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-4-16 01:13:14 | 只看该作者
T-4-Q21
原文结论:OLEX不关闭Grenville refinery 是因为此公司认为企业社会责任,不会仅因为高利润而关闭。
E,说是因为关闭Grenville refinery 很可能会带来很多相关费用。刚好反驳原文说不是因为利润的论点。
B,是无关选项吧,想太远了。

T-4-Q38
题目问的是哪个选项说明这个请愿书会误导选民对这个议案的理解。
B。说农村没有retail establishments and government offices ,所以农村的选民可能会觉得这个禁烟的议案与他们无关。是“misleading”.看清问题很关键啊。
A好像还是无关选项啊,和保险有什么关系?
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-4-18 23:09:28 | 只看该作者
谢谢sun~~是我自己没看清题目,多谢指点迷津,感谢感谢^^
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-20 13:47
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部