ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3223|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全D-7

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-3-6 00:34:00 | 只看该作者

大全D-7

7.     The postal service is badly mismanaged. Forty years ago, first-class letter delivery cost only three cents. Since then, the price has increased nearly tenfold, with an actual decrease in the speed and reliability of service.


Each of the following statements, if true, would tend to weaken the argument above EXCEPT:


(A) The volume of mail handled by the postal service has increased dramatically over the last forty years.


(B) Unprecedented increases in the cost of fuel for trucks and planes have put severe upward pressures on postal delivery costs.


(C) Private delivery services usually charge more than does the postal service for comparable delivery charges.


(D) The average delivery time for a first-class letter four decades ago was actually slightly longer than it is today.E


(E) The average level of consumer prices overall has increased more than 300 percent over the last forty years.


想請問一下  位什麼 E不能削弱 ARGUMENT  我的理解是  如果consumer prices  increase 300 percent over last forty year


那 postal sevice increase tenfold  就不算是mismanaged  不是嗎  因為上漲的幅度是合理的  我不知道我錯哪裡  請指教  謝謝先



11.   Gloria: Those who advocate tuition tax credits for parents whose children attend private schools maintain that people making no use of a government service should not be forced to pay for it. Yet those who choose to buy bottled water rather than drink water from the local supply are not therefore exempt from paying taxes to maintain the local water supply.


Roger: Your argument is illogical. Children are required by law to attend school. Since school attendance is a matter not of choice, but of legal requirement, it is unfair for the government to force some parents to pay for it twice.


Which of the following responses by Gloria would best refute Roger’s charge that her argument is illogical?


(A) Although drinking water is not required by law, it is necessary for all people, and therefore my analogy is appropriate.


(B) Those who can afford the tuition at a high-priced private school can well bear the same tax burden as those whose children attend public schools.


(C) If tuition tax credits are granted, the tax burden on parents who choose public schools will rise to an intolerable level.


(D) The law does not say that parents must send their children to private schools, only that the children must attend some kind of school, whether public or private.A


(E) Both bottled water and private schools are luxury items, and it is unfair that some citizens should be able to afford them while others cannot.



我想請問一下  這一題的E是錯哪裡阿  謝謝

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2006-3-7 01:24:00 | 只看该作者

謝謝你  但是我想第七題的E  如果是加強的話 不就應該是答案嗎  因為答案是要EXCEPT


板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2006-3-8 02:18:00 | 只看该作者
謝謝你的講解 我了解了  我把tenfold  想成100%
地板
发表于 2008-10-3 07:04:00 | 只看该作者

我选了C, 觉得C某种程度也加强了,或者说不相关。牛牛说说,C错在哪?

对于答案E,难道涨价涨得多,就能直接推出是badly mismanaged?感觉E很牵强。

5#
发表于 2008-10-4 09:27:00 | 只看该作者

up!

6#
发表于 2009-10-4 02:48:00 | 只看该作者
想請問C怎麼weaken? 感覺是個無關選項
7#
发表于 2010-2-11 18:18:09 | 只看该作者

weaken EXCEPT : 无关选项可以选吗?

想請問C怎麼weaken? 感覺是個無關選項
-- by 会员 WhiteScarf (2009/10/4 2:48:00)


如果该选项为无关选项, 表示无法WEAKEN, WEAKN 取非的问题中可以选吗?
8#
发表于 2010-4-14 12:17:28 | 只看该作者
同问 "如果该选项为无关选项, 表示无法WEAKEN, 在WEAKN 取非的问题中可以选吗? "
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 00:20
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部