LSAT-4-4-1,LSAT-4-4-10

1.     Terry: If you want to get a decent job, you should go to college.

Mark: That is not true. There are other reasons to go to college than wanting to get a good job.

Mark’s response shows that he interpreted Terry’s remarks to mean that

(A) college is one of many places to get trained for a job

(B) decent jobs are obtained only by persons who have gone to college

(C) wanting to get a decent job is the only reason for going to college

(D) training for decent jobs is available only at colleges（C）

(E) all people who want decent jobs go to college

我选成A,不知道该怎样推理?

10.   The reforms to improve the quality of public education that have been initiated on the part of suppliers of public education have been insufficient. Therefore, reforms must be demanded by consumers. Parents should be given government vouchers with which to pay for their children’s education and should be allowed to choose the schools at which the vouchers will be spent. To attract students, academically underachieving schools will be forced to improve their academic offerings.

The argument assumes that

(A) in selecting schools parents would tend to prefer a reasonable level of academic quality to greater sports opportunities or more convenient location

(B) improvement in the academic offerings of schools will be enforced by the discipline of the job market in which graduating students compete

(C) there is a single best way to educate students

(D) children are able to recognize which schools are better and would influence their parents’ decisions（A）

(E) schools would each improve all of their academic offerings and would not tend to specialize in one particular field to the exclusion of others

是否通过最后一句判断?我看到greater sports opportunities or more convenient location把A排除了

1.Mark’s response shows that he interpreted Terry’s remarks to mean that(是问T的论述的假设，不是M的）

10.政府作为保证人建议家长选择学校，所以学校要提高教学质量．A说家长选择学校关注教学质量多于关注其它

1是指M把T的话理解成啥了，这得根据M的话来看，M说，T你说的不对，去上学还有很多其他的理由。由此推出M假设T说的是拿好OFFER是上学的唯一理由。