ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1993|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大家帮我看一下吧 大谢!! 蓝皮商学院 上的

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-3-30 09:15:10 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Sales taxes tend to be regressive,affecting poor people more severely than wealthy people. When allpurchases of consumer goodsare taxed at a fixed percentage of the purchaseprice, poor people pay a larger proportion of their income in sales taxes than wealthypeople do.

Itcan be correctly inferred on the basis of the statements above that which ofthe following is true?

A.       Poor people constitute a larger proportion of the taxpaying populationthan wealthy people do.

B.       Poor people spend a larger proportion of their income on purchases of consumergoods than wealthy people do.

C.      Wealthy people pay, on average, a larger amount of sales taxes thanpoor people do.

D.      The total amount spent by all poor people on purchases of consumergoods exceeds the total amount spent by all wealthy people on consumergoods.

E.       The average purchase price of consumer goods bought by wealthy people is higher than that of consumer goods bought by poor people.

Answer: B

我选的D 不明白这两个有什么区别?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-3-30 10:11:59 | 只看该作者
B谈的是比例,D谈的是绝对值。D从常理上来说也不对啊,穷人怎么可能买东西比富人还多呢?

比如穷人月薪1000,但是需要花500在吃的上面,这个proportion就是50%。富人月入2000000,花200000在吃的上面,够腐败了吧,proportion也只有10%。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-3-30 19:10:40 | 只看该作者
B谈的是比例,D谈的是绝对值。D从常理上来说也不对啊,穷人怎么可能买东西比富人还多呢?

比如穷人月薪1000,但是需要花500在吃的上面,这个proportion就是50%。富人月入2000000,花200000在吃的上面,够腐败了吧,proportion也只有10%。
-- by 会员 hughlv (2010/3/30 10:11:59)

嗯嗯 对 而且 我还发现了一个错误 就是有all 太绝对化了。。呵呵 太粗心了。。
谢谢!!
地板
发表于 2010-3-31 10:38:28 | 只看该作者
我之前的解释有个问题。就是D描述的是穷人的花费总和与富人的花费总和进行比较。这个谁高谁低就说不定了,因为跟人口数相关。
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-3-31 13:54:25 | 只看该作者
我之前的解释有个问题。就是D描述的是穷人的花费总和与富人的花费总和进行比较。这个谁高谁低就说不定了,因为跟人口数相关。
-- by 会员 hughlv (2010/3/31 10:38:28)



恩 谢谢!!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-6 10:46
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部