ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1235|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教两道KAPLAN逻辑(请一定止步!)

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-4-8 11:43:00 | 只看该作者

请教两道KAPLAN逻辑(请一定止步!)

做了几套KAPLAN试卷,最大的感觉就是阅读文章很长,逻辑题以evaulation题偏主。

In interviews with jurors inquiring how they arrived at their verdicts, researchers found that 40 percent of the references juror made were to factors that had not been included in courtroom testimony. To improve the jury system, the researchers suggested that judges give instructions to the jury at the beginning of trial rather than at the end. They argued that this would permit jurors to concentrate on the most relevant evidence rather than filling in gaps with their own assumptions, which have little to do with the legality of a case.

 

The answer to which of the following questions is LEAST directly relevant to evaluating the researchers’ suggestion above?

 

A  Is it possible for a judge to instruct a jury at the end of a trial in such a way that jurors will disregard any irrelevant factors they had been using to weigh the evidence?

B  Will a jury that hears a judge’s instructions at the beginning of a trial be able to weigh the evidence accordingly once that evidence has actually been presented?

C  Will having judges give instrctions at the begining of a trial rather than at the end significantly after the customary procedures employed by the judicial system?

D  When jurors are queried as to how they arrived at their verdicts, does their interpretation of their decision-making process include many references to factors that were not, in fact, influential?

E  If jurors hear the judge’s instructions at the beginning of a trial, what percentage of the factors that influence their decisions will be matters that were not presented in the evidence?

 

答案C

感觉都不是很明白呢

Our system of unemplyment insurance is self-defeating, since it requires those receiving benefits to devote their time to seeking work. We are in a period of tremedous economic change, and today an unemployed worker is probably out of  work because his position has been eliminated. It would be more pratical, therefore, to require the beneficiaries of unemployment, insurance to enroll in classes that would teach them skills that will lead to successful self-employment.

 

An assumption central to the following argument is that

 

A  The benefits paid to an unemployed worker are drawn from money collected from the worker during period of his employment.

B  Few industries that were important to the economy at the time the current system of unemployment insurance was created are essential in today’s economic climate.

C  For the system of unemployment insurance to benefit society as a whole, the insurance of the individual unemployed worker may have to be sacrificed.

D  As the economy changes, there will be an increasing number of job oppotunities available for skilled workers.

E  Most of those currently receiving unemployment unsurance can be adequately retrained for the jobs that will be available in the near future.

 

答案E  我选D的

觉得E有道理,但是D又排除不掉啊。

请指教!

沙发
发表于 2009-4-9 12:12:00 | 只看该作者
我逻辑是从做ASSUMPTION 开始 so 我先来回答你的第2题

应该选E

D

做assumption 的我的原则,排出无关选项后

1)正确选项+ 原题的premise 能必推出 结论
2)正确选项能弥补原题推论的GAP
3)取非验证

现有的INSURANCE 体系自相矛盾,他只是让找不到工作的人找工作。很多人丢失工作是因为这个工种被淘汰了。结论:更实际的做法,现有的体系应该是鼓励拿INSURANCE人去训练新适合就业的技能。


ABC首先全部无关,

D 将会有更过的工作机会给掌握技能的人 --〉可视无关选项,没有涉及训练
E 这些人能够被训练成适合新工作    -〉弥补一个明显的GAP


D 取非:未来没有多工作机会 -〉 无法weaken
E 取非:这些人不能被训练到适合工作 - 〉weaken
板凳
发表于 2009-4-9 12:14:00 | 只看该作者
个人感觉 第一反应就是E 抓到E 后 不需要多去想D 为什么错 造成联想过度


地板
发表于 2009-4-9 12:44:00 | 只看该作者
我先来试着回答一下第一题吧。
题目问的是下列问题哪个和题干中研究者的建议最无关。
先来看题干中研究者研究的核心。主要是在说现在的陪审团制度有一个问题,目前法官给提示是在审判结束时,这样陪审员在作出裁决时会有主观臆想的因素,也就是文中所说的40%。所以研究者建议法官在审判最一开始就给予提示,这样陪审员就可以concentrate on最相关的证据上了。
而来看C选项,说得是这样的一种新方法会不会被司法系统接受。这明显说的是另一回事了。
而其他选项都还就事论事,在主题范围内。所以选C。



您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-6 16:20
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部