ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1909|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]陈向东归纳63

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-4-3 12:29:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]陈向东归纳63

    

63.The fire that destroyed the Municipal Building started before dawn this morning, and the last fire fighters did not leave until late this afternoon. No one could have been anywhere in the vicinity of a fire like that one and fail to notice it. Thomas must have seen it, whatever he now says to the contrary. He admits that, as usual, he went from his apartment to the library this morning, and there is no way for him to get from his apartment to the library without going past the Municipal Building.


                             The main conclusion of the argument is that


(A) Thomas was in the vicinity of the fire this morning


(B) Thomas claimed not to have seen the fire


(C) Thomas saw the fire this morning


(D) Thomas went directly from his apartment to the library this morningC


(E) Thomas went by the Municipal Building this morning


陈在解释AB时这样写道:因为黎明前是一个很笼统的时间概念,单从此很难判断出T是在火灾发生前还是在火灾发生后经过市政大楼的,所以AB不一定是正确的选项。

大家有没有觉得这样的解释太过牵强,难道正常人会before dawn this morninglibrary?这么早去,人家门还没开呢,天还没亮呢!我并不是说T一定会在火灾后过去,只是认为B也可以作为答案,因为文中说Thomas must have seen it, whatever he now says to the contrary.那么可以推出B,而且BC在关于是否看到火灾的事情上意思是差不多的。大家帮忙看看我的理解是否有偏差?

沙发
发表于 2004-4-3 13:28:00 | 只看该作者
原文有一句:Thomas must have seen it, whatever he now says to the contrary.


这句话就说明了B的意思,不用结论了。。。注意选项一定要能把全文的信息都包括进来,让所有信息都能在答案中起到或多或少,或直接或间接的信息。


如果是答案B,那么原文除上句以外其他句子都可以不要嘛。这也太简单了,不具有综合联系分析能力。ETS不会考这么EZ的题目的。注意,不要把ETS当小孩,丫尖锐的狠!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-27 14:22
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部